Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29468742›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2018

Dog introduction alters the home dust microbiota.

A R Sitarik, S Havstad, A M Levin, S V Lynch, K E Fujimura, D R Ownby, C C Johnson, G Wegienka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. The role of dog keeping in the home microbiota and its impact on children's health.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Our Best Friends: How Dogs Alter Indoor Air Quality.Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The impact of prenatal dog keeping on infant gut microbiota development.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Metagenomics reveals novel microbial signatures of farm exposures in house dust.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A R SitarikDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
S HavstadDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
A M LevinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
S V LynchDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
K E FujimuraDivision of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
D R OwnbyDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
C C JohnsonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
G WegienkaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7281-1193

Funding

The Effect of Dog-Keeping and the Intestinal Microbiota on Immune DevelopmentP01AI089473 · NIAID · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI OWNBY, DENNIS R · 2012 to 2024
$25.7M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ALLERGIC DISEASE ENDOTYPESR01AI110450 · NIAID · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI WEGIENKA, GANESA REBECCA · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI089473NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has largely reported that dog exposure is associated with reduced allergic disease risk. Responsible mechanism(s) are not understood. The goal was to investigate whether introducing a dog into the home changes the home dust microbiota. Families without dogs or cats planning to adopt a dog and those who were not were recruited. Dust samples were collected from the homes at recruitment and 12 months later. Microbiota composition and taxa (V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene) were compared between homes that did and did not adopt a dog. A total of 91 dust samples from 54 families (27 each, dog and no dog; 17 dog and 20 no dog homes with paired samples) were analyzed. A significant dog effect was seen across time in both unweighted UniFrac and Canberra metrics (both P = .008), indicating dog introduction may result in rapid establishment of rarer and phylogenetically related taxa. A significant dog-time interaction was seen in both weighted UniFrac (P < .001) and Bray-Curtis (P = .002) metrics, suggesting that while there may not initially be large relative abundance shifts following dog introduction, differences can be seen within a year. Therefore, dog introduction into the home has both immediate effects and effects that emerge over time.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyMicrobiotaAir Pollution, IndoorAnimalsDogsDustEnvironmental MonitoringHousingHumansHypersensitivityDustallergyasthmadoghygiene hypothesismicrobiomemicrobiota hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID29468742
PMCPMC6003855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.