Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29468702›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Identifying optimal dosage regimes under safety constraints: An application to long term opioid treatment of chronic pain.

Eric B Laber, Fan Wu, Catherine Munera, Ilya Lipkovich, Salvatore Colucci, Steve Ripa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Fusing Individualized Treatment Rules Using Secondary Outcomes.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A single-index model with a surface-link for optimizing individualized dose rules.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Estimation and Optimization of Composite Outcomes.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Precision Medicine.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric B LaberNCSU, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-7696
Fan WuNCSU, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Catherine MuneraPurdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, CT, USA.
Ilya LipkovichIQVIA, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1936-2197
Salvatore ColucciPurdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, CT, USA.
Steve RipaPurdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, CT, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Supplement: Spatiotemporal models for periodontal disease monitoring and recall frequenciesR01DE024984 · NIDCR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, DIPANKAR, REICH, BRIAN J. · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest and investment in precision medicine as a means to provide the best possible health care. A treatment regime formalizes precision medicine as a sequence of decision rules, one per clinical intervention period, that specify if, when and how current treatment should be adjusted in response to a patient's evolving health status. It is standard to define a regime as optimal if, when applied to a population of interest, it maximizes the mean of some desirable clinical outcome, such as efficacy. However, in many clinical settings, a high-quality treatment regime must balance multiple competing outcomes; eg, when a high dose is associated with substantial symptom reduction but a greater risk of an adverse event. We consider the problem of estimating the most efficacious treatment regime subject to constraints on the risk of adverse events. We combine nonparametric Q-learning with policy-search to estimate a high-quality yet parsimonious treatment regime. This estimator applies to both observational and randomized data, as well as settings with variable, outcome-dependent follow-up, mixed treatment types, and multiple time points. This work is motivated by and framed in the context of dosing for chronic pain; however, the proposed framework can be applied generally to estimate a treatment regime which maximizes the mean of one primary outcome subject to constraints on one or more secondary outcomes. We illustrate the proposed method using data pooled from 5 open-label flexible dosing clinical trials for chronic pain.

Indexed as

Drug Dosage CalculationsAnalgesics, OpioidChronic PainHumansLong-Term CareModels, StatisticalPrecision MedicineStatistics as TopicStatistics, NonparametricAnalgesics, Opioidchronic painflexible dosing trialspolicy-searchprecision medicineQ-learningtreatment dosing regimes

Identifiers

PMID29468702
PMCPMC6293986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.