Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29468447›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2018

The Views of Mental Health Manager Towards the Use of a Family Work Model for Psychosis in Guangzhou, China.

Jeremy Dixon, Jie Lei, Wanyi Huang, Jacqueline Sin, Gina Smith

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy DixonDepartment of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Jie LeiSchool of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. leijie199147@163.com.
Wanyi HuangDepartment of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Jacqueline SinSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Gina SmithAvon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath NHS House, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · CNSt George's, University of London · GBSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2015-08-035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family Interventions in Psychosis (FIP) have been promoted internationally but have been criticised for being based on western cultural models. This paper reports on a focus group study with 10 Integrated Mental Health Service Managers in Guangzhou, China using thematic analysis. Managers believed FIP might benefit families but identified potential difficulties due to (a) families avoiding services due to the 'shame' of mental illness (b) unrealistic expectations of services amongst families (c) deferral to 'key decision-makers' within families when discussing family issues with workers. The findings indicate that FIP work should focus on interaction between carers in the first instance with service users being introduced into sessions at a later date and that more attention needs to be given by the research community to how FIP may be adapted to cultural norms within China.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelFamily TherapyChinaFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Facility AdministratorsHumansMaleMental Health ServicesPsychotic DisordersFamily interventionsFamily therapyPsychosisQualitative researchSocial work in China

Identifiers

PMID29468447
OpenAlexW2788661144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.