ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2018
Maximizing gain in high-throughput screening using conformal prediction.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty Quantification with Domain Classification Models for Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Non-natural Amino Acid-based Modifications in Antibacterial Peptides.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Machine Learning for Enhanced Identification Probability in RPLC/HRMS Nontargeted Workflows.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- CPSign: conformal prediction for cheminformatics modeling.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- The effect of noise on the predictive limit of QSAR models.Journal of cheminformatics · 2021Article
- Synergy conformal prediction applied to large-scale bioactivity datasets and in federated learning.Journal of cheminformatics · 2021Article
- Assigning confidence to molecular property prediction.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2021Article
- Predicting the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Molecules with Machine Learning Models Trained on Biologically Meaningful Descriptors.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Skin Doctor CP: Conformal Prediction of the Skin Sensitization Potential of Small Organic Molecules.Chemical research in toxicology · 2021Article
- The Distribution of Standard Deviations Applied to High Throughput Screening.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Large scale comparison of QSAR and conformal prediction methods and their applications in drug discovery.Journal of cheminformatics · 2019Article
- Novel applications of Machine Learning in cheminformatics.Journal of cheminformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iterative screening has emerged as a promising approach to increase the efficiency of screening campaigns compared to traditional high throughput approaches. By learning from a subset of the compound library, inferences on what compounds to screen next can be made by predictive models, resulting in more efficient screening. One way to evaluate screening is to consider the cost of screening compared to the gain associated with finding an active compound. In this work, we introduce a conformal predictor coupled with a gain-cost function with the aim to maximise gain in iterative screening. Using this setup we were able to show that by evaluating the predictions on the training data, very accurate predictions on what settings will produce the highest gain on the test data can be made. We evaluate the approach on 12 bioactivity datasets from PubChem training the models using 20% of the data. Depending on the settings of the gain-cost function, the settings generating the maximum gain were accurately identified in 8-10 out of the 12 datasets. Broadly, our approach can predict what strategy generates the highest gain based on the results of the cost-gain evaluation: to screen the compounds predicted to be active, to screen all the remaining data, or not to screen any additional compounds. When the algorithm indicates that the predicted active compounds should be screened, our approach also indicates what confidence level to apply in order to maximize gain. Hence, our approach facilitates decision-making and allocation of the resources where they deliver the most value by indicating in advance the likely outcome of a screening campaign.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.