Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29468044›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

Low rates of hybridization between European wildcats and domestic cats in a human-dominated landscape.

Katharina Steyer, Annika Tiesmeyer, Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes, Carsten Nowak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Phylogenetic History and Phylogeographic Patterns of the European Wildcat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hybridization betweenEcology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharina SteyerConservation Genetics Group Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Gelnhausen Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6111-5213
Annika TiesmeyerConservation Genetics Group Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Gelnhausen Germany.
Violeta Muñoz-FuentesConservation Genetics Group Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Gelnhausen Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3574-546X
Carsten NowakConservation Genetics Group Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt Gelnhausen Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization between wild species and their domestic congeners is considered a major threat for wildlife conservation. Genetic integrity of the European wildcat, for instance, is a concern as they are outnumbered by domestic cats by several orders of magnitude throughout its range. We genotyped 1,071 individual wildcat samples obtained from hair traps and roadkills collected across the highly fragmented forests of western Central Europe, in Germany and Luxembourg, to assess domestic cat introgression in wildcats in human-dominated landscapes. Analyses using a panel of 75 autosomal SNPs suggested a low hybridization rate, with 3.5% of wildcat individuals being categorized as F1, F2, or backcrosses to either parental taxon. We report that results based on a set of SNPs were more consistent than on a set of 14 microsatellite markers, showed higher accuracy to detect hybrids and their class in simulation analyses, and were less affected by underlying population structure. Our results strongly suggest that very high hybridization rates previously reported for Central Europe may be partly due to inadequate choice of markers and/or sampling design. Our study documents that an adequately selected SNP panel for hybrid detection may be used as an alternative to commonly applied microsatellite markers, including studies relying on noninvasively collected samples. In addition, our finding of overall low hybridization rates in Central European wildcats provides an example of successful wildlife coexistence in human-dominated, fragmented landscapes.

Indexed as

Felis silvestrishair trapsmicrosatellitesmitochondrial DNAroadkillsSNPs

Identifiers

PMID29468044
PMCPMC5817136
OpenAlexW2794356858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.