Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29468030›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

Introgression of exotic

Stephanie L Smith, Helen V Senn, Sílvia Pérez-Espona, Megan T Wyman, Elizabeth Heap, Josephine M Pemberton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Introgression of exoticEcology and evolution · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie L SmithInstitute of Evolutionary Biology School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.
Helen V SennWildGenes Laboratory Royal Zoological Society of Scotland Edinburgh UK.
Sílvia Pérez-EsponaEstación Biológica de Doñana CSIC Seville Spain.
Megan T WymanMammal Vocal Communication and Cognition Research School of Psychology University of Sussex Falmer UK.
Elizabeth HeapInstitute of Evolutionary Biology School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.
Josephine M PembertonInstitute of Evolutionary Biology School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0075-1504
University of Edinburgh · GBEstación Biológica de Doñana · ESRoyal Zoological Society of Scotland · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the mid-19th century, multiple introductions of Japanese sika deer (

Indexed as

conservationintroductionmicrosatellite, hybridizationmtDNAred deersikawildlife management

Identifiers

PMID29468030
PMCPMC5817139
OpenAlexW2790010517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.