Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467972›Full record

ArticleJournal of graduate medical education2018

A Qualitative Analysis of Attending Physicians' Use of Shared Decision-Making: Implications for Resident Education.

Elizabeth M Schoenfeld, Sarah L Goff, Tala R Elia, Errel R Khordipour, Kye E Poronsky, Kelly A Nault, Peter K Lindenauer, Kathleen M Mazor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of graduate medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Shared Decision Making for the Emergency Provider: Engaging Patients When Seconds Count.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Qualitative Analysis of Patients' Perceptions of Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: "Let Me Know I Have a Choice".Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth M Schoenfeld
Sarah L Goff
Tala R Elia
Errel R Khordipour
Kye E Poronsky
Kelly A Nault
Peter K Lindenauer
Kathleen M Mazor

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001064 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2013 to 2017
$26.4M
Research and Mentoring in Comparative Effectiveness and Implementation ScienceK24HL132008 · NHLBI · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI LINDENAUER, PETER KYLE · 2016 to 2020
$574k
Physician Perspectives Regarding the Use of Shared Decision-Making in the Emergency DepartmentR03HS024311 · AHRQ · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI SCHOENFELD, ELIZABETH MAE · 2015 to 2016
$83k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS024311NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001064NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL132008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians need to rapidly and effectively facilitate patient-centered, shared decision-making (SDM) conversations, but little is known about how residents or attending physicians acquire this skill.

objectiveWe explored emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians' use of SDM in the context of their experience as former residents and current educators and assessed the implications of these findings on learning opportunities for residents.

methodsWe used semistructured interviews with a purposeful sample of EM physicians. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and 3 research team members performed iterative, open coding of transcripts, building a provisional codebook as work progressed. We analyzed the data with a focus on participants' acquisition and use of skills required for SDM and their use of SDM in the context of resident education.

resultsFifteen EM physicians from academic and community practices were interviewed. All reported using SDM techniques to some degree. Multiple themes noted had negative implications for resident acquisition of this skill: (1) the complex relationships among patients, residents, and attending physicians; (2) residents' skill levels; (3) the setting of busy emergency departments; and (4) individual attending factors. One theme was noted to facilitate resident education: the changing culture-with a cultural shift toward patient-centered care.

conclusionsA constellation of factors may diminish opportunities for residents to acquire and practice SDM skills. Further research should explore residents' perspectives, address the modifiable obstacles identified, and examine whether these issues generalize to other specialties.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmergency MedicineMedical Staff, HospitalPatient ParticipationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelEmergency Service, HospitalHumansInterviews as TopicPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchSocial Theory

Identifiers

PMID29467972
PMCPMC5821016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.