ArticleOncotarget2018
Meta-analysis of a 10-plex urine-based biomarker assay for the detection of bladder cancer.
Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the Oncuria-Detect Multiplex Immunoassay in Detecting Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.The Journal of urology · 2026Article
- The role of angiogenin in bladder cancer: where are we in 2025?International urology and nephrology · 2025Review
- Performance of the Oncuria-Detect bladder cancer test for evaluating patients presenting with haematuria: results from a real-world clinical setting.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Association of SNPs in the PAI1 Gene with Disease Recurrence and Clinical Outcome in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Influencing Factors on the Oncuria™ Urinalysis Assay: An Experimental Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Research Progress of Urine Biomarkers in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Bladder Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Proteomic profiling of bladder cancer for precision medicine in the clinical setting: A review for the busy urologist.Investigative and clinical urology · 2020Review
- Analytical validation of ONCURIA™ a multiplex bead-based immunoassay for the non-invasive bladder cancer detection.Practical laboratory medicine · 2020Article
- Can new immunoassay techniques improve bladder cancer diagnostics With protein biomarkers?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2020Article
- Prognostic Significance of Lymphocyte Infiltration and a Stromal Immunostaining of a Bladder Cancer Associated Diagnostic Panel in Urothelial Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Comparison of Commercial ELISA Kits, a Prototype Multiplex Electrochemoluminescent Assay, and a Multiplex Bead-Based Immunoassay for Detecting a Urine-Based Bladder-Cancer-Associated Diagnostic Signature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Diagnostic biomarkers in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.World journal of urology · 2019Review
- Discovery and Validation of Novel Biomarkers for Detection of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.Cells · 2019Article
- Urinary Markers in Bladder Cancer: An Update.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A 10-plex urine-based bladder cancer (BCa) diagnostic signature has the potential to non-invasively predict the presence of BCa in at-risk patients, as reported in various case-control studies. The present meta-analysis was performed to re-evaluate and demonstrate the robustness and consistency of the diagnostic utility of the 10-plex urine-based diagnostic assay. We re-analyzed primary data collected in five previously published case-control studies on the 10-plex diagnostic assay. Studies reported the sensitivity and specificity of ten urinary protein biomarkers for the detection of BCa, including interleukin 8, matrix metalloproteinases 9 and 10, angiogenin, apolipoprotein E, syndecan 1, alpha-1 antitrypsin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, carbonic anhydrase 9, and vascular endothelial growth factor A. Data were extracted and reviewed independently by two investigators. Log odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine how strongly the 10-plex biomarker panel and individual biomarkers are associated with the presence of BCa. Data pooled from 1,173 patients were analyzed. The log OR for each biomarker was improved by 1.5 or greater with smaller 95% CI in our meta-analysis of the overall cohort compared with each analysis of an individual cohort. The combination of the ten biomarkers showed a higher log OR (log OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.60-4.31) than did any single biomarker irrespective of histological grade or disease stage of tumors. We concluded that the 10-plex BCa-associated diagnostic signature demonstrated a higher potential to identify BCa when compared to any single biomarker. Our results justify further advancement of the 10-plex protein-based diagnostic signature toward clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.