Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467953›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Meta-analysis of a 10-plex urine-based biomarker assay for the detection of bladder cancer.

Norihiko Masuda, Osamu Ogawa, Meyeon Park, Alvin Y Liu, Steve Goodison, Yunfeng Dai, Landon Kozai, Hideki Furuya, Yair Lotan, Charles J Rosser and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of angiogenin in bladder cancer: where are we in 2025?International urology and nephrology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Norihiko MasudaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Osamu OgawaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Meyeon ParkDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Alvin Y LiuDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Steve GoodisonDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Yunfeng DaiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Landon KozaiClinical & Translational Research Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
Hideki FuruyaClinical & Translational Research Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
Yair LotanDepartment of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Charles J RosserClinical & Translational Research Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPUniversity of Hawaii Cancer CenterMayo Clinic in Florida · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

VALIDATION OF A MULTIPLEXED ASSAY FOR BLADDER CANCER DIAGNOSISR01CA198887 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI ROSSER, CHARLES J · 2016 to 2025
$6.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 10-plex urine-based bladder cancer (BCa) diagnostic signature has the potential to non-invasively predict the presence of BCa in at-risk patients, as reported in various case-control studies. The present meta-analysis was performed to re-evaluate and demonstrate the robustness and consistency of the diagnostic utility of the 10-plex urine-based diagnostic assay. We re-analyzed primary data collected in five previously published case-control studies on the 10-plex diagnostic assay. Studies reported the sensitivity and specificity of ten urinary protein biomarkers for the detection of BCa, including interleukin 8, matrix metalloproteinases 9 and 10, angiogenin, apolipoprotein E, syndecan 1, alpha-1 antitrypsin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, carbonic anhydrase 9, and vascular endothelial growth factor A. Data were extracted and reviewed independently by two investigators. Log odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine how strongly the 10-plex biomarker panel and individual biomarkers are associated with the presence of BCa. Data pooled from 1,173 patients were analyzed. The log OR for each biomarker was improved by 1.5 or greater with smaller 95% CI in our meta-analysis of the overall cohort compared with each analysis of an individual cohort. The combination of the ten biomarkers showed a higher log OR (log OR: 3.46, 95% CI: 2.60-4.31) than did any single biomarker irrespective of histological grade or disease stage of tumors. We concluded that the 10-plex BCa-associated diagnostic signature demonstrated a higher potential to identify BCa when compared to any single biomarker. Our results justify further advancement of the 10-plex protein-based diagnostic signature toward clinical application.

Indexed as

diagnosismeta-analysisurinary bladderurine biomarkersurothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29467953
PMCPMC5805539
OpenAlexW2782126823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.