Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467935›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

A robust gene expression-based prognostic risk score predicts overall survival of lung adenocarcinoma patients.

En-Guo Chen, Pin Wang, Haizhou Lou, Yunshan Wang, Hong Yan, Lei Bi, Liang Liu, Bin Li, Antoine M Snijders, Jian-Hua Mao and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Validation of Anticorrelated TGFβ Signaling and Alternative End-Joining DNA Repair Signatures that Predict Response to Genotoxic Cancer Therapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

En-Guo Chen *Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Pin Wang *Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Haizhou Lou *Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yunshan WangBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Hong YanBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Lei BiBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Liang LiuDepartment of Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Bin LiNanjing KDRB Biotech Inc., Ltd, Jiangning District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Antoine M SnijdersBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jian-Hua MaoBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Bo HangBiological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USZhejiang University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of reliable predictive biomarkers and new therapeutic targets is a critical step for significant improvement in patient outcomes. Here, we developed a multi-step bioinformatics analytic strategy to mine large omics and clinical data to build a prognostic scoring system for predicting the overall survival (OS) of lung adenocarcinoma (LuADC) patients. In latter we first identified 1327 significantly and robustly deregulated genes, 600 of which were significantly associated with the OS of LuADC patients. Gene co-expression network analysis revealed the biological functions of these 600 genes in normal lung and LuADCs, which were found to be enriched for cell cycle-related processes, blood vessel development, cell-matrix adhesion and metabolic processes. Finally, we implemented a multiple resampling method combined with Cox regression analysis to identify a 27-gene signature associated with OS, and then created a prognostic scoring system based on this signature. This scoring system robustly predicted OS of LuADC patients in 100 sampling test sets and was further validated in four independent LuADC cohorts. In addition, in comparison to other existing prognostic gene signatures published in the literature, our signature was significantly superior in predicting OS of LuADC patients. In summary, our multi-omics and clinical data integration study created a 27-gene prognostic risk score that can predict OS of LuADC patients independent of age, gender and clinical stage. This score could guide therapeutic selection and allow stratification in clinical trials.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsgene signaturelung adenocarcinomaoverall survivalprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29467935
PMCPMC5805521
OpenAlexW2776199856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.