Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467885›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Paclitaxel plus nedaplatin vs. paclitaxel plus carboplatin in women with epithelial ovarian cancer: A multi-center, randomized, open-label, phase III trial.

Li Li, Qingqing Zhuang, Zeyi Cao, Rutie Yin, Yaping Zhu, Lirong Zhu, Xing Xie, Youzhong Zhang, Li Li, Qiang Wu and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Li LiDepartment of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China.
Qingqing ZhuangDepartment of Gynecology, The First People's Hospital of Jining, Jining, Shandong 272000, P.R. China.
Zeyi CaoDepartment of Gynecology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100049, P.R. China.
Rutie YinDepartment of Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China.
Yaping ZhuDepartment of Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 200080, P.R. China.
Lirong ZhuDepartment of Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, P.R. China.
Xing XieDepartment of Gynecology, Women's Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, P.R. China.
Youzhong ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250012, P.R. China.
Li LiDepartment of Gynecology, Daping Hospital, Research Institute of Surgery Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, P.R. China.
Qiang WuDepartment of Gynecology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, P.R. China.
Jianhua ZhengDepartment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150001, P.R. China.
Qi ZhouDepartment of Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, P.R. China.
Xiaoping LiDepartment of Gynecology, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing 400030, P.R. China.
Lingying WuDepartment of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, P.R. China.
Youji FengDepartment of Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 200080, P.R. China.
Changyu WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China.
Daping Hospital · CNShanghai First People's Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNChongqing Cancer Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNJiangsu Cancer Hospital · CNJining First People's Hospital · CNPeking University First Hospital · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNSichuan University · CNTsinghua University · CNWomen's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The multi-center, randomized, open-label, phase III trial discussed in the present study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of nedaplatin (NDP) plus paclitaxel, and carboplatin (CBP) plus paclitaxel for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In the current study, 182 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II-IV EOC were randomly assigned to receive NDP plus paclitaxel or CBP plus paclitaxel at 3-week intervals for a total of six courses. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival rate (PFS) and overall survival rate (OS). The secondary endpoints were toxicity profiles. The median follow-up was 44.63 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 33.67-46.47 months] for the NDP group and 47.63 months (95% CI 45.13-49.07 months) for the CBP group. Overall, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between the two groups (P=0.09 for PFS, and P=0.65 for OS). For the patients with FIGO stage III-IV EOC, the NDP plus paclitaxel regimen significantly prolonged PFS (P=0.02) but did not result in improved OS (P=0.53) when compared with the CBP group. The patients in the NDP plus paclitaxel group also exhibited a lower incidence rate of grade 3 or 4 leucopenia (P=0.03). Other hematological and non-hematological toxicity profiles were similar between the two groups. Compared with CBP plus paclitaxel regimens, NDP plus paclitaxel regimens achieved comparable survival outcomes and similar toxicity profiles. However, patients of FIGO stage III-IV EOC may experience more clinical benefits from NDP plus paclitaxel treatment, including a prolonged PFS and a lower incidence rate of leucopenia. Therefore, an NDP-based regimen may be an alternative choice when using platinum-based agents to treat EOC.

Indexed as

carboplatinchemotherapyepithelial ovarian cancernedaplatinpaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID29467885
PMCPMC5796383
OpenAlexW2783844541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.