ArticleNeuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press)2018
Amiodarone-associated Optic Neuropathy-A Clinical Criteria-based Diagnosis?
Article in Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artemisinin conferred cytoprotection to human retinal pigment epithelial cells exposed to amiodarone-induced oxidative insult by activating the CaMKK2/AMPK/Nrf2 pathway.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy secondary to Posner-Schlossman syndrome in a twenty-six-year-old female.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2023Article
- Clinical and Mechanistic Review of Amiodarone-Associated Optic Neuropathy.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Risk Factors of Eye Complications in Patients Treated in the Intensive Care Unit.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- 14th EUNOS Congress: PORTO, PORTUGAL, 16-19 JUNE 2019.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amiodarone-associated optic neuropathy (AAON) is a controversial diagnosis with possible impact on vital cardiac therapy decisions. This retrospective case series aims for application of distinguishing features of AAON versus non-arteritic ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION): Bilaterality, mode of onset, degree of optic nerve dysfunction, structure of uninvolved disc (unilateral cases), and systemic toxic effects. Applying these criteria to patients with disc swelling under amiodarone, the authors identified four unilateral disc swellings, one with NAION-typical features only and three with one or more NAION-atypical features. All three sequential and six bilateral cases showed one or more NAION-atypical features. The 12 cases highlight the persisting diagnostic dilemma arising from diversity of presentation, lack of plausible pathomechanism, and controversial existence of the entity itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.