ArticleFrontiers in genetics2018
Detection of Potential Problematic
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Geographic Patterns of Intra- and Interspecific Diversity of Riverine Fish Species in the Italian Northern Apennines and Ligurian Alps.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- MitoNGS: an online platform to analyze fish metabarcoding data in high resolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- VoronaGasyCodes: A Public Database of Mitochondrial Barcodes for Malagasy Birds.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Microbial and Fish Communities in the Thracian Sea Revealed by eDNA Metabarcoding.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- The first complete mitochondrial genome of Zu cristatus (Bonelli, 1819) sheds new light on its phylogenetic position and molecular evolution.BMC zoology · 2025Article
- In Vouchers We (Hope to) Trust: Unveiling Hidden Errors in GenBank's Tetrapod Taxonomic Foundations.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- The Development of DNA Markers to Resolve Uncertainties of Seabird Bycatch Identification From Longline Fisheries in Australian Waters.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Time-calibrated phylogeny of neotropical freshwater fishes.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Molecular Barcoding: A Tool to Guarantee Correct Seafood Labelling and Quality and Preserve the Conservation of Endangered Species.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Utility of cytochrome c oxidase I for the deciphering of unstable phylogeny and taxonomy of gorals, genusZooKeys · 2023Article
- A detailed workflow to develop QIIME2-formatted reference databases for taxonomic analysis of DNA metabarcoding data.BMC genomic data · 2022Article
- An integrative re-evaluation of Typhlatya shrimp within the karst aquifer of the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- An evaluation of errors in the mitochondrial COI sequences of Hydrachnidia (Acari, Parasitengona) in public databases.Experimental & applied acarology · 2022Article
- Sharp Increase of Problematic Mitogenomes of Birds: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- Review
- Determining the Authenticity of Shark Meat Products by DNA Sequencing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- ACDC, a global database of amphibian cytochrome-b sequences using reproducible curation for GenBank records.Scientific data · 2020Article
- Marine water environmental DNA metabarcoding provides a comprehensive fish diversity assessment and reveals spatial patterns in a large oceanic area.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fishes are, by far, the most diverse group of vertebrates. Their classification relies heavily on morphology. In practice, the correct morphological identification of species often depends on personal experience because many species vary in their body shape, color and other external characters. Thus, the identification of a species may be prone to errors. Due to the rapid development of molecular biology, the number of sequences of fishes deposited in GenBank has grown explosively. These published data likely contain errors owing to invalid or incorrectly identified species. The erroneous data can lead to downstream problems. Thus, it is critical that such errors get identified and corrected. A strategy based on DNA barcoding can detect potentially erroneous data, especially when intraspecific K2P variation exceeds interspecific K2P divergence. Analyses of the most used DNA marker for fishes (mitochondrial
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.