Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467618›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2018

Reevaluation of

Hagar Mor-Shaked, Rachel Eiges

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cage effects on synaptic plasticity and its modulation in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Diet in treatment of autism spectrum disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Rethinking Intellectual Disability from Neuro- to Astro-Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Of Men and Mice: Modeling the Fragile X Syndrome.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hagar Mor-ShakedStem Cell Research Laboratory, Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Rachel EigesStem Cell Research Laboratory, Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shaare Zedek Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is one of the most common heritable forms of cognitive impairment. It results from a fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) protein deficiency caused by a CGG repeat expansion in the 5'-UTR of the X-linked

Indexed as

CGG expansionDNA methylationepigenetic gene silencingFMR1Fragile X syndrome

Identifiers

PMID29467618
PMCPMC5808132
OpenAlexW2793322854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.