ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2018
Open Science Meets Stem Cells: A New Drug Discovery Approach for Neurodegenerative Disorders.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative Therapeutic Strategies in Alzheimer's Disease: A Synergistic Approach to Neurodegenerative Disorders.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Design and validation of a conceptual model regarding impact of open science on healthcare research processes.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Biotechnological advances and applications of human pluripotent stem cell-derived heart models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Human Pluripotent Stem-Cell-Derived Models as a Missing Link in Drug Discovery and Development.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Viral pandemic preparedness: A pluripotent stem cell-based machine-learning platform for simulating SARS-CoV-2 infection to enable drug discovery and repurposing.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021Article
- Prospects of Directly Reprogrammed Adult Human Neurons for Neurodegenerative Disease Modeling and Drug Discovery: iN vs. iPSCs Models.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Intranasal administration of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells as a suitable approach for Parkinson's disease therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Induced pluripotent stem cells for neural drug discovery.Drug discovery today · 2019Review
- DeepNEU: Artificially Induced Stem Cell (aiPSC) and Differentiated Skeletal Muscle Cell (aiSkMC) Simulations of Infantile Onset POMPE Disease (IOPD) for Potential Biomarker Identification and Drug Discovery.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019Article
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells; New Tools for Investigating Molecular Mechanisms in Anorexia Nervosa.Frontiers in nutrition · 2019Review
- One Step Into the Future: New iPSC Tools to Advance Research in Parkinson's Disease and Neurological Disorders.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are a challenge for drug discovery, as the biological mechanisms are complex and poorly understood, with a paucity of models that faithfully recapitulate these disorders. Recent advances in stem cell technology have provided a paradigm shift, providing researchers with tools to generate human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from patient cells. With the potential to generate any human cell type, we can now generate human neurons and develop "first-of-their-kind" disease-relevant assays for small molecule screening. Now that the tools are in place, it is imperative that we accelerate discoveries from the bench to the clinic. Using traditional closed-door research systems raises barriers to discovery, by restricting access to cells, data and other research findings. Thus, a new strategy is required, and the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) and its partners are piloting an "Open Science" model. One signature initiative will be that the MNI biorepository will curate and disseminate patient samples in a more accessible manner through open transfer agreements. This feeds into the MNI open drug discovery platform, focused on developing industry-standard assays with iPSC-derived neurons. All cell lines, reagents and assay findings developed in this open fashion will be made available to academia and industry. By removing the obstacles many universities and companies face in distributing patient samples and assay results, our goal is to accelerate translational medical research and the development of new therapies for devastating neurodegenerative disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.