Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467542›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Tubulation repair mitigates misdirection of regenerating motor axons across a sciatic nerve gap in rats.

Dan Liu, Daguo Mi, Tuanjie Zhang, Yanping Zhang, Junying Yan, Yaxian Wang, Xuefeng Tan, Ying Yuan, Yumin Yang, Xiaosong Gu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neurotransmission Recovery by Melatonin Measured by CMAP.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. [Research progress of peripheral nerve mismatch regeneration].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Natural-Based Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Injury Repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dan LiuKey Laboratory for Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education and Co-innovation Center for Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Daguo MiDepartment of Orthopedics, Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Tuanjie ZhangKey Laboratory for Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education and Co-innovation Center for Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Yanping ZhangKey Laboratory for Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education and Co-innovation Center for Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Junying YanSchool of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Yaxian WangKey Laboratory for Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education and Co-innovation Center for Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Xuefeng TanSchool of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Ying YuanKey Laboratory for Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education and Co-innovation Center for Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Yumin YangKey Laboratory for Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education and Co-innovation Center for Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Xiaosong GuKey Laboratory for Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education and Co-innovation Center for Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China.
Wen HuKey Laboratory for Neuroregeneration of Ministry of Education and Co-innovation Center for Neuroregeneration of Jiangsu Province, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China. hoo@ntu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-0883-5566
Nantong University · CNAnyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNLongyan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair of peripheral nerve laceration injury to obtain optimal function recovery remains a big challenge in the clinic. Misdirection of regenerating axons to inappropriate target, as a result of forced mismatch of endoneurial sheaths in the case of end-to-end nerve anastomosis or nerve autografting, represents one major drawback that limits nerve function recovery. Here we tested whether tubulation repair of a nerve defect could be beneficial in terms of nerve regeneration accuracy and nerve function. We employed sequential retrograde neuronal tracing to assess the accuracy of motor axon regeneration into the tibial nerve after sciatic nerve laceration and entubulation in adult Sprague-Dawley rats. In a separate cohort of rats with the same sciatic nerve injury/repair protocols, we evaluated nerve function recovery behaviorally and electrophysiologically. The results showed that tubulation repair of the lacerated sciatic nerve using a 3-6-mm-long bioabsorbable guidance conduit significantly reduced the misdirection of motor axons into the tibial nerve as compared to nerve autografting. In addition, tubulation repair ameliorated chronic flexion contracture. This study suggests that tubulation repair of a nerve laceration injury by utilizing a bioresorbable nerve guidance conduit represents a potential substitute for end-to-end epineurial suturing and nerve autografting.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBiocompatible MaterialsFemaleGuided Tissue RegenerationNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionSciatic NerveTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID29467542
PMCPMC5821835
OpenAlexW2789757994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.