Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467486›Full record

GuidelineLeukemia2018

ERIC recommendations for TP53 mutation analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia-update on methodological approaches and results interpretation.

J Malcikova, E Tausch, D Rossi, L A Sutton, T Soussi, T Zenz, A P Kater, C U Niemann, D Gonzalez, F Davi and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Leukemia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Haematologica · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. ComplexInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Targeting the p53/xCT/GSH Axis with PRIMA-1International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 15 institutions in 11 countries.

J MalcikovaDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
E TauschDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
D RossiHematology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Institute of Oncology Research, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
L A SuttonDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
T SoussiUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-3293
T ZenzDivision of Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
A P KaterDepartment of Hematology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C U NiemannDepartment of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
D GonzalezCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
F DaviDepartment of Hematology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtière, AP-HP, Sorbonne Universités-UPMC University, Paris, France.
M Gonzalez DiazCentro de Investigación del Cancer and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
C MorenoDepartment of Haematology, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
G GaidanoDivision of Haematology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
K StamatopoulosInstitute of Applied Biosciences, CERTH, Thessaloniki, Greece.
R RosenquistDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
S StilgenbauerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
P GhiaDivision of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. ghia.paolo@hsr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3750-7342
S PospisilovaDepartment of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Medical Faculty, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. pospisilova.sarka@fnbrno.cz.
European Research Initiative on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (ERIC) — TP53 network
Central European Institute of Technology · CZUniversität Ulm · DEUppsala University · SEAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLCentre for Research and Technology Hellas · GRInserm · FROspedale San Giovanni Bellinzona · CHQueen's University Belfast · GBRigshospitalet · DKSorbonne Université · FRUniversidad de Salamanca · ESUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · ITUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Zurich · CHVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), TP53 gene defects, due to deletion of the 17p13 locus and/or mutation(s) within the TP53 gene, are associated with resistance to chemoimmunotherapy and a particularly dismal clinical outcome. On these grounds, analysis of TP53 aberrations has been incorporated into routine clinical diagnostics to improve patient stratification and optimize therapeutic decisions. The predictive implications of TP53 aberrations have increasing significance in the era of novel targeted therapies, i.e., inhibitors of B-cell receptor (BcR) signaling and anti-apoptotic BCL2 family members, owing to their efficacy in patients with TP53 defects. In this report, the TP53 Network of the European Research Initiative on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (ERIC) presents updated recommendations on the methodological approaches for TP53 mutation analysis. Moreover, it provides guidance to ensure that the analysis is performed in a timely manner for all patients requiring treatment and that the data is interpreted and reported in a consistent, standardized, and accurate way. Since next-generation sequencing technologies are gaining prominence within diagnostic laboratories, this report also offers advice and recommendations for the interpretation of TP53 mutation data generated by this methodology.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisEuropeGenes, p53High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell

Identifiers

PMID29467486
PMCPMC5940638
OpenAlexW2789078984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.