Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467478›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2018

Reappraisal of HER2 status in the spectrum of advanced urothelial carcinoma: a need of guidelines for treatment eligibility.

Anissa Moktefi, Damien Pouessel, Jing Liu, Nanor Sirab, Pascale Maille, Pascale Soyeux, Christiane Copie Bergman, Marie Luce Auriault, Dimitri Vordos, Alexandre de la Taille and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anissa MoktefiAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Pathology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert Chenevier, Créteil, F-94010, France.
Damien PouesselDépartement Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, (UPEC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, INSERM U 955, Créteil, F-94010, France.
Jing LiuInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, CNRS, UMR144, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Paris, 75005, France.
Nanor SirabDépartement Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, (UPEC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, INSERM U 955, Créteil, F-94010, France.
Pascale MailleDépartement Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, (UPEC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, INSERM U 955, Créteil, F-94010, France.
Pascale SoyeuxDépartement Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, (UPEC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, INSERM U 955, Créteil, F-94010, France.
Christiane Copie BergmanAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Pathology Department, Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert Chenevier, Créteil, F-94010, France.
Marie Luce AuriaultPathology Department, Centre hospitalier de La Rochelle, La Rochelle, F-17000, France.
Dimitri VordosDépartement Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, (UPEC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, INSERM U 955, Créteil, F-94010, France.
Alexandre de la TailleDépartement Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, (UPEC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, INSERM U 955, Créteil, F-94010, France.
Stéphane CulineAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, F-75010, France.
Yves AlloryDépartement Hospitalo-Universitaire (DHU), Virus-Immunité-Cancer (VIC), Université Paris-Est-Créteil, (UPEC), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, INSERM U 955, Créteil, F-94010, France. yves.allory@curie.fr.
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier de La Rochelle · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) may represent a therapeutic target, its evaluation in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder does not rely on a standardized scoring system by immunohistochemistry or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), as reflected by various methodology in the literature and clinical trials. Our aim was to improve and standardize HER2 amplification detection in bladder cancer. We assessed immunohistochemical criteria derived from 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAPs) guidelines for breast cancer and investigated intratumoral heterogeneity in a retrospective multicentric cohort of 188 patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 178 primary tumors and 126 lymph node metastases, eligible cases (moderate/strong, complete/incomplete membrane staining) were assessed by FISH. HER2 overexpression was more frequent with 2013 ASCO/CAP than 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines (p < 0.0001). The rate of positive HER2 FISH was similar between primary tumor and lymph node metastases (8%). Among positive FISH cases, 48% were associated with moderate/strong incomplete membrane staining that were not scored eligible for FISH by 2007 ASCO/CAP criteria. Among 3+ immunohistochemistry score cases, 67% were associated with HER2-positive FISH. Concordance between primary tumors and matched lymph node metastases was moderate for immunohistochemistry (κ = 0.54 (CI 95%, 0.41-0.67)) and FISH (κ = 0.50 (CI 95%, 0.20-0.79)). HER2-positive FISH was more frequent in micropapillary carcinomas (12%) and carcinoma with squamous differentiation (11%) than in pure conventional carcinoma (6%). Intratumoral heterogeneity for HER2 immunohistochemistry was observed in 7% primary tumor and 6% lymph node metastases; 24% positive HER2 FISH presented intratumoral heterogeneity. Our study suggests that HER2 evaluation should include an immunohistochemistry screening step with eligibility for FISH including incomplete/complete and moderate/strong membrane staining. Spatial or temporal intratumoral heterogeneity prompts to perform evaluation on both tumor and lymph node, and for each histological variant observed.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene AmplificationHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID29467478
OpenAlexW2791152065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.