Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29467265›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Anupama Prakash, Antónia Monteiro

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Flight or protection: the genesProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dissection of Larval and Pupal Wings ofMethods and protocols · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. CRISPR-Cas9 Mediated Genome Editing inMethods and protocols · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anupama PrakashDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore anupama@u.nus.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-2806
Antónia MonteiroDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore antonia.monteiro@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0001-9696-459X
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Butterflies have evolved different colour patterns on their dorsal and ventral wing surfaces to serve different signalling functions, yet the developmental mechanisms controlling surface-specific patterning are still unknown. Here, we mutate both copies of the transcription factor

Indexed as

PhenotypeAnimalsBiological EvolutionButterfliesClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsColorGene ExpressionGene Regulatory NetworksInsect ProteinsMutationPigmentationTranscription FactorsWings, AnimalInsect ProteinsTranscription Factorsapterousbutterfly wing patternsdevelopmental constraintsdorsal–ventral differentiationeyespot repression

Identifiers

PMID29467265
PMCPMC5832707
OpenAlexW2951656253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.