ArticleBMJ open2018
NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme in England: formative evaluation of the programme in early phase implementation.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Using health economic modelling to inform the design and development of an intervention: estimating the justifiable cost of weight loss maintenance in the UK.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Influences on NHS Health Check behaviours: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2020Pooled it
- How are health-related behaviours influenced by a diagnosis of pre-diabetes? A meta-narrative review.BMC medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Using a peer-led network to overcome the barriers to innovation in the NHS: the case of the NHS InSites Programme.BMJ innovations · 2026Article
- The Application of Omics Technologies in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Research.Current diabetes reviews · 2026Review
- BrDMrisc - Online Brazilian Risk Score for Incident Type 2 Diabetes - ELSA-Brasil Cohort.Revista de saude publica · 2026Article
- Implementation of diabetes prevention programs into clinical practice and community settings: a systematic search and review.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- The Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcomes Study: NIDDK's Journey Into the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes and Its Public Health Impact.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- National health and economic impact of a lifestyle program to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a simulation study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2024Article
- Article
- A qualitative evaluation of the national rollout of a diabetes prevention programme in England.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Knowledge in Motion: A Comprehensive Review of Evidence-Based Human Kinetics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Digital Behavior Change Interventions for the Prevention and Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Market Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Review
- Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2022Review
- Effect of dietary fat intake and genetic risk on glucose and insulin-related traits in Brazilian young adults.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2021Article
- The Fidelity of Training in Behaviour Change Techniques to Intervention Design in a National Diabetes Prevention Programme.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2021Article
- Is the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme Intervention Delivered as Planned? An Observational Study of Fidelity of Intervention Delivery.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2021Observational
- Healthcare Voucher Scheme for Screening of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Trends in type 2 diabetes mellitus disease burden in European Union countries between 1990 and 2019.Scientific reports · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEvaluation of the demonstrator phase and first wave roll-out of the National Health Service (NHS) Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP) in England. To examine: (1) intervention design, provision and fidelity assessment procedures; (2) risk assessment and recruitment pathways and (3) data collection for monitoring and evaluation. To provide recommendations informing decision makers on programme quality, improvements and future evaluation.
designWe reviewed programme documents, mapping against the NHS DPP specification and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) public health guideline: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevention in people at high risk (PH38), conducted qualitative research using individual interviews and focus group discussions with stakeholders and examined recruitment, fidelity and data collection procedures.
settingSeven NHS DPP demonstrator sites and, subsequently, 27 first wave areas across England.
interventionsIntensive behavioural intervention with weight loss, diet and physical activity goals. The national programme specifies at least 13 sessions over 9 months, delivered face to face to groups of 15-20 adults with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia, mainly recruited from primary care and NHS Health Checks.
participantsParticipants for qualitative research were purposively sampled to provide a spread of stakeholder experience. Documents for review were provided via the NHS DPP Management Group.
findingsThe NHS DPP specification reflected current evidence with a clear framework for service provision. Providers, with national capacity to deliver, supplied intervention plans compliant with this framework. Stakeholders highlighted limitations in fidelity assessment and recruitment and retention challenges, especially in reach and equity, that could adversely impact on implementation. Risk assessment for first wave eligibility differed from NICE guidance.
conclusionsThe NHS DPP provides an evidence-based behavioural intervention for prevention of T2D in adults at high risk, with capacity to deliver nationally. Framework specification allows for balance between consistency and contextual variation in intervention delivery, with session details devolved to providers. Limitations in fidelity assurance, data collection procedures and recruitment issues could adversely impact on intervention effectiveness and restrict evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.