ArticleStem cell research & therapy2018
A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell Therapy for Ischemic Stroke with Nanoparticle-Labeled 293T Cells and Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Feasibility Study.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Regenerative Strategies for Vocal Fold Repair Using Injectable Materials.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An evaluation of spraying as a delivery method for human mesenchymal stem cells suspended in low-methyl pectin solutions.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional bio-derived materials for biomedical applications: challenges and opportunities.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Biosponge-Encased Placental Stem Cells for Volumetric Muscle Loss Repair.Advances in wound care · 2025Article
- Fibril-Guided Three-Dimensional Assembly of Human Fibroblastic Reticular Cells.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- Mechanism of damage of HIF-1 signaling in chronic diabetic foot ulcers and its related therapeutic perspectives.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Advances in stem cell therapy for diabetic foot.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- [Research advances on stem cell therapy for diabetic foot wounds].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022Review
- Co-delivery of fibrin-laminin hydrogel with mesenchymal stem cell spheroids supports skeletal muscle regeneration following trauma.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2021Article
- Constructing a cell microenvironment with biomaterial scaffolds for stem cell therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2021Review
- Translational Applications of Hydrogels.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- Photo-Polymerization Damage Protection by Hydrogen Sulfide Donors for 3D-Cell Culture Systems Optimization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Injectable Biomaterials for Dental Tissue Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- The interplay between chondrocyte spheroids and mesenchymal stem cells boosts cartilage regeneration within a 3D natural-based hydrogel.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Stem cells from the dental apical papilla in extracellular matrix hydrogels mitigate inflammation of microglial cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Cell armor for protection against environmental stress: Advances, challenges and applications in micro- and nanoencapsulation of mammalian cells.Acta biomaterialia · 2019Review
- Naturally-Derived Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications.Advances in experimental medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNumerous stem cell therapies use injection-based administration to deliver high-density cell preparations. However, cell retention rates as low as 1% have been observed within days of transplantation. This study investigated the effects of varying administration and formulation parameters of injection-based administration on cell dose recovery and differentiation fate choice of human mesenchymal stem cells.
methodsThe impact of ejection rate via clinically relevant Hamilton micro-syringes and biomaterial-assisted delivery was investigated. Cell viability, the percentage of cell dose delivered as viable cells, proliferation capacity as well as differentiation behaviour in bipotential media were assessed. Characterisation of the biomaterial-based cell carriers was also carried out.
resultsA significant improvement of in-vitro dose recovery in cells co-ejected with natural biomaterials was observed, with ejections within 2% (w/v) gelatin resulting in 87.5 ± 14% of the cell dose being delivered as viable cells, compared to 32.2 ± 19% of the dose ejected in the commonly used saline vehicle at 10 μl/min. Improvement in cell recovery was not associated with the rheological properties of biomaterials utilised, as suggested by previous studies. The extent of osteogenic differentiation was shown to be substantially altered by choice of ejection rate and cell carrier, despite limited contact time with cells during ejection. Collagen type I and bone-derived extracellular matrix cell carriers yielded significant increases in mineralised matrix deposited at day 21 relative to PBS.
conclusionsAn enhanced understanding of how administration protocols and biomaterials influence cell recovery, differentiation capacity and choice of fate will facilitate the development of improved administration and formulation approaches to achieve higher efficacy in stem cell transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.