Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29466983›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2018

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laura B Nellums, Kieran Rustage, Sally Hargreaves, Jon S Friedland

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. "Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Effect of Global Fund financial support for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura B NellumsInfectious Diseases & Immunity, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 ONN, UK.
Kieran RustageInfectious Diseases & Immunity, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 ONN, UK.
Sally HargreavesInfectious Diseases & Immunity, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 ONN, UK.
Jon S FriedlandInfectious Diseases & Immunity, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W12 ONN, UK. j.friedland@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209993/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a growing concern in meeting global targets for TB control. In high-income low-TB-incidence countries, a disproportionate number of MDR-TB cases occur in migrant (foreign-born) populations, with concerns about low adherence rates in these patients compared to the host non-migrant population. Tackling MDR-TB in this context may, therefore, require unique approaches. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and synthesise data on MDR-TB treatment adherence in migrant patients to inform evidence-based strategies to improve care pathways and health outcomes in this group.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO 42017070756). The databases Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health and PubMed were searched to 24 May 2017 for primary research reporting MDR-TB treatment adherence and outcomes in migrant populations, with no restrictions on dates or language. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models.

resultsFrom 413 papers identified in the database search, 15 studies reporting on MDR-TB treatment outcomes for 258 migrants and 174 non-migrants were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The estimated rate of adherence to MDR-TB treatment across migrant patients was 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 58-84%], with non-adherence reported among 20% (95% CI = 4-37%) of migrant patients. A key finding was that there were no differences in estimated rates of adherence [risk ratio (RR) = 1.05; 95% CI = 0.82-1.34] or non-adherence (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.79-1.36) between migrants and non-migrants.

conclusionsMDR-TB treatment adherence rates among migrants in high-income low-TB-incidence countries are approaching global targets for treatment success (75%), and are comparable to rates in non-migrants. The findings highlight that only just over 70% of migrant and non-migrant patients adhere to MDR-TB treatment. The results point to the importance of increasing adherence in all patient groups, including migrants, with an emphasis on tailoring care based on social risk factors for poor adherence. We believe that MDR-TB treatment targets are not ambitious enough.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsAntitubercular AgentsHumansTreatment Adherence and ComplianceTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular AgentsDrug resistanceMigrationTreatment adherenceTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID29466983
PMCPMC5822608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.