ArticleImmunity2018
A New Link between γδ T Cells and Myeloid Cells in Malaria?
Article in Immunity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- γδ T Cells in Antimalarial Immunity: New Insights Into Their Diverse Functions in Protection and Tolerance.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Gamma/Delta T Cells and Their Role in Protection Against Malaria.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In malaria, the immune responses leading to protective immunity versus immunopathology are unclear. Mamedov et al. (2018) identify a subset of clonally expanded γδ T cells in late-stage infection that produce M-CSF and may interact with myeloid cells to control recrudescent infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.