Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29466591›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2018

Effect of Haloperidol on Survival Among Critically Ill Adults With a High Risk of Delirium: The REDUCE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mark van den Boogaard, Arjen J C Slooter, Roger J M Brüggemann, Lisette Schoonhoven, Albertus Beishuizen, J Wytze Vermeijden, Danie Pretorius, Jan de Koning, Koen S Simons, Paul J W Dennesen and 16 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01785290 (Prophylactic Haloperidol Use for Delirium in ICU Patients; a Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Multicentre Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 117 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
29.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01785290 phase4completednot on this map

Prophylactic Haloperidol Use for Delirium in ICU Patients; a Randomized Placebo-controlled Double-blind Multicentre Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2013 to 2017Enrolled1,800ConditionsDeliriumArmsHaloperidol 1 mg/q8h, Haloperidol 2 mg/q8h, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Interventions for preventing intensive care unit delirium in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark van den BoogaardDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Arjen J C SlooterDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Roger J M BrüggemannDepartment of Pharmacy Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lisette SchoonhovenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Albertus BeishuizenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
J Wytze VermeijdenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Danie PretoriusDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, St Jansdal Hospital Harderwijk, the Netherlands.
Jan de KoningDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Máxima Medical Center Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Koen S SimonsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital Den-Bosch, the Netherlands.
Paul J W DennesenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Peter H J Van der VoortDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Saskia HoutermanCatharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
J G van der HoevenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
REDUCE Study Investigators
Margaretha C. E. van der WoudeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
Anna BesselinkDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
Lieuwe S HofstraDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Scheper Hospital, Emmen, the Netherlands
Peter E SpronkDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
Walter van den BerghDepartment of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
Dirk W DonkerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine and Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Malaika FuchsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Attila KarakusDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands
M KoemanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands
Mirella van DuijnhovenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands
Gerjon HanninkDepartment of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLGelre Hospitals · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLRijnstate Hospital · NLTIAS School for Business and Society · NLVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NLZuyderland Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Results of studies on use of prophylactic haloperidol in critically ill adults are inconclusive, especially in patients at high risk of delirium. Objective: To determine whether prophylactic use of haloperidol improves survival among critically ill adults at high risk of delirium, which was defined as an anticipated intensive care unit (ICU) stay of at least 2 days. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigator-driven study involving 1789 critically ill adults treated at 21 ICUs, at which nonpharmacological interventions for delirium prevention are routinely used in the Netherlands. Patients without delirium whose expected ICU stay was at least a day were included. Recruitment was from July 2013 to December 2016 and follow-up was conducted at 90 days with the final follow-up on March 1, 2017. Interventions: Patients received prophylactic treatment 3 times daily intravenously either 1 mg (n = 350) or 2 mg (n = 732) of haloperidol or placebo (n = 707), consisting of 0.9% sodium chloride. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was the number of days that patients survived in 28 days. There were 15 secondary outcomes, including delirium incidence, 28-day delirium-free and coma-free days, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU and hospital length of stay. Results: All 1789 randomized patients (mean, age 66.6 years [SD, 12.6]; 1099 men [61.4%]) completed the study. The 1-mg haloperidol group was prematurely stopped because of futility. There was no difference in the median days patients survived in 28 days, 28 days in the 2-mg haloperidol group vs 28 days in the placebo group, for a difference of 0 days (95% CI, 0-0; P = .93) and a hazard ratio of 1.003 (95% CI, 0.78-1.30, P=.82). All of the 15 secondary outcomes were not statistically different. These included delirium incidence (mean difference, 1.5%, 95% CI, -3.6% to 6.7%), delirium-free and coma-free days (mean difference, 0 days, 95% CI, 0-0 days), and duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU, and hospital length of stay (mean difference, 0 days, 95% CI, 0-0 days for all 3 measures). The number of reported adverse effects did not differ between groups (2 [0.3%] for the 2-mg haloperidol group vs 1 [0.1%] for the placebo group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among critically ill adults at high risk of delirium, the use of prophylactic haloperidol compared with placebo did not improve survival at 28 days. These findings do not support the use of prophylactic haloperidol for reducing mortality in critically ill adults. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01785290.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsCritical IllnessDeliriumDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHaloperidolHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisAntipsychotic AgentsHaloperidol

Identifiers

PMID29466591
PMCPMC5839284
OpenAlexW2793524874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.