Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29466454›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Interaction between FKBP5 variability and recent life events in the anxiety spectrum: Evidence for the differential susceptibility model.

Beatriz Pérez-Pérez, Paula Cristóbal-Narváez, Tamara Sheinbaum, Thomas R Kwapil, Sergi Ballespí, Elionora Peña, Marta de Castro-Catala, Maria Dolors Riba, Araceli Rosa, Neus Barrantes-Vidal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CD4Neurobiology of stress · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatriz Pérez-PérezDepartament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Paula Cristóbal-NarváezResearch, Innovation and Teaching Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Tamara SheinbaumDepartament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Thomas R KwapilDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.
Sergi BallespíDepartament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Elionora PeñaSecció de Zoologia i Antropologia Biològica, Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Marta de Castro-CatalaSecció de Zoologia i Antropologia Biològica, Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Dolors RibaDepartament de Psicobiologia i Metodologia de Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Araceli RosaCentre for Biomedical Research Network on Mental Health (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Neus Barrantes-VidalDepartament de Psicologia Clínica i de la Salut, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-1238
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInstitut de Biomedicina de la Universitat de BarcelonaInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGene-environment interaction (GxE) research has highlighted the importance of investigating the FK506 binding protein 51 (FKBP5) gene as a sensitivity gene. However, previous GxE studies with FKBP5 have not measured the full environmental spectrum or applied statistical tests to discern whether the GxE interaction fits better with the differential-susceptibility or diathesis-stress hypotheses. This study examined whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on FKBP5 gene moderate the association of positive and negative recent life events (LEs) with depressive symptoms, state-anxiety, neuroticism, and social anxiety traits.

methodsA total of 86 nonclinical young adults were administered psychological measures and were genotyped for five FKBP5 SNPs (rs3800373, rs9296158, rs1360780, rs9470080 and rs4713916).

resultsRegression analyses indicated significant GxE interactions for social anxiety and neuroticism. The interactions predicting neuroticism fit different models for different SNPs, although the overall effect indicated by the haplotype was consistent with the differential-susceptibility hypothesis: the risk-haplotype group presented higher neuroticism in the presence of more negative LEs and lower neuroticism in the presence of more positive LEs. The GxE interactions for social anxiety were consistent with the diathesis-stress model. The lack of significance in the for-better side for social anxiety might be related to the fact that it mapped onto low extraversion, which is associated with a lower permeability to positive experiences. DISCUSSION: Findings underscore the importance of testing the differential-susceptibility model in relation to FKBP5 to adequately characterize its role in healthy and pathological developmental processes.

Indexed as

AnxietyDental AnxietyDepressionFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalNeuroticismPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesStress, PsychologicalTacrolimus Binding Protein 5Tacrolimus Binding ProteinsYoung AdultTacrolimus Binding Protein 5Tacrolimus Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29466454
PMCPMC5821376
OpenAlexW2789469250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.