Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29466392›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Differences between co-cultures and monocultures in testing the toxicity of particulate matter derived from log wood and pellet combustion.

Stefanie Kasurinen, Mikko S Happo, Teemu J Rönkkö, Jürgen Orasche, Jorma Jokiniemi, Miika Kortelainen, Jarkko Tissari, Ralf Zimmermann, Maija-Riitta Hirvonen, Pasi I Jalava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cellular Pre-Adaptation to the High OAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefanie KasurinenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3407-8776
Mikko S HappoDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Teemu J RönkköDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jürgen OrascheHICE-Helmholtz Virtual Institute of Complex Molecular Systems in Environmental Health-Aerosols and Health, Munich, Germany.
Jorma JokiniemiDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Miika KortelainenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jarkko TissariDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Ralf ZimmermannHICE-Helmholtz Virtual Institute of Complex Molecular Systems in Environmental Health-Aerosols and Health, Munich, Germany.
Maija-Riitta HirvonenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Pasi I JalavaDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIHelmholtz Zentrum München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn vitro studies with monocultures of human alveolar cells shed deeper knowledge on the cellular mechanisms by which particulate matter (PM) causes toxicity, but cannot account for mitigating or aggravating effects of cell-cell interactions on PM toxicity.

methodsWe assessed inflammation, oxidative stress as well as cytotoxic and genotoxic effects induced by PM from the combustion of different types of wood logs and softwood pellets in three cell culture setups: two monocultures of either human macrophage-like cells or human alveolar epithelial cells, and a co-culture of these two cell lines. The adverse effects of the PM samples were compared between these setups.

resultsWe detected clear differences in the endpoints between the mono- and co-cultures. Inflammatory responses were more diverse in the macrophage monoculture and the co-culture compared to the epithelial cells where only an increase of IL-8 was detected. The production of reactive oxygen species was the highest in epithelial cells and macrophages seemed to have protective effects against oxidative stress from the PM samples. With no metabolically active cells at the highest doses, the cytotoxic effects of the PM samples from the wood log combustion were far more pronounced in the macrophages and the co-culture than in the epithelial cells. All samples caused DNA damage in macrophages, whereas only beech and spruce log combustion samples caused DNA damage in epithelial cells. The organic content of the samples was mainly associated with cytotoxicity and DNA damage, while the metal content of the samples correlated with the induction of inflammatory responses.

conclusionsAll of the tested PM samples induce adverse effects and the chemical composition of the samples determines which pathway of toxicity is induced. In vitro testing of the toxicity of combustion-derived PM in monocultures of one cell line, however, is inadequate to account for all the possible pathways of toxicity.

Indexed as

WoodCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCoculture TechniquesHumansInflammationMacrophagesMutagenicity TestsOxidative StressParticulate MatterPulmonary AlveoliParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID29466392
PMCPMC5821343
OpenAlexW2789744560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.