ArticlePloS one2018
Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.
- Certified Nurse-Midwife Practice Authority as a Structural Determinant of Maternal Health.The Milbank quarterly · 2026Article
- Barriers to Medicaid Participation for Community Midwives in California.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2026Article
- Midwifery Care and Doula Support for Black Women in the United States: A Systematic Review of Maternal, Birth, and Infant Outcomes.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Review
- Community Midwifery Postpartum Care: National Data From Community Practice.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2026Article
- Increasing and inequitable US pregnancy-related mortality ratios among non-Hispanic Black and White women, 2000-2019.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Retrospective Cohort Study on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cesarean Birth in a Midwifery-Integrated Health System.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2026Article
- State variations in maternal and child health workforce support.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Assessing Racial/Ethnic Variation and Trends in Vaginal Birth after Cesarean in California: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Linked Birth Certificate and Hospital Discharge Records.American journal of perinatology · 2026Article
- Out-of-hospital births and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study from a level IV NICU and review of regulatory frameworks.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- "The Very Best That It Could Be and a Lot Better Than I Would Have Imagined": Birthing People's Experiences of Transfer From Community to Hospital.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Barriers to Rural Midwifery: An Integrative Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Review
- Midwifery Care in the United States: Increasing Access and Utilization to Improve Perinatal Health Outcomes.Obstetrical & gynecological survey · 2025Review
- The Benefits of Licensed Midwifery and Community Birth Among BIPOC Birthing People in New Mexico.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2025Article
- Development of a midwifery regulatory environment index using data from the Global Midwives' Associations map survey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- How has the integration of midwives into primary healthcare settings impacted access to care? A qualitative descriptive study from Ontario, Canada.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Documentation of Stigmatizing Language in Electronic Health Records and Birth Outcomes.Health equity · 2025Article
- Low birthweight rate differences associated with distinct perinatal staffing mixes at federally funded health centers.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Peripartum Cardiomyopathy and Social Vulnerability: An Epidemiological Analysis of Mortality Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Postpartum care for parent-infant dyads: A community midwifery model.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2024Article
- Integrated maternity care: A concept analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
methodsOur multidisciplinary team examined published regulatory data to inform a 50-state database describing the environment for midwifery practice and interprofessional collaboration. Items (110) detailed differences across jurisdictions in scope of practice, autonomy, governance, and prescriptive authority; as well as restrictions that can affect patient safety, quality, and access to maternity providers across birth settings. A nationwide survey of state regulatory experts (n = 92) verified the 'on the ground' relevance, importance, and realities of local interpretation of these state laws. Using a modified Delphi process, we selected 50/110 key items to include in a weighted, composite Midwifery Integration Scoring (MISS) system. Higher scores indicate greater integration of midwives across all settings. We ranked states by MISS scores; and, using reliable indicators in the CDC-Vital Statistics Database, we calculated correlation coefficients between MISS scores and maternal-newborn outcomes by state, as well as state density of midwives and place of birth. We conducted hierarchical linear regression analysis to control for confounding effects of race.
resultsMISS scores ranged from lowest at 17 (North Carolina) to highest at 61 (Washington), out of 100 points. Higher MISS scores were associated with significantly higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery, vaginal birth after cesarean, and breastfeeding, and significantly lower rates of cesarean, preterm birth, low birth weight infants, and neonatal death. MISS scores also correlated with density of midwives and access to care across birth settings. Significant differences in newborn outcomes accounted for by MISS scores persisted after controlling for proportion of African American births in each state.
conclusionThe MISS scoring system assesses the level of integration of midwives and evaluates regional access to high quality maternity care. In the United States, higher MISS Scores were associated with significantly higher rates of physiologic birth, less obstetric interventions, and fewer adverse neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.