Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29466381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Transmission of fungal partners to incipient Cecropia-tree ant colonies.

Veronika E Mayer, Maximilian Nepel, Rumsais Blatrix, Felix B Oberhauser, Konrad Fiedler, Jürg Schönenberger, Hermann Voglmayr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A new family of ant-associated fungi inStudies in mycology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Volatile Organic Compounds in theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Veronika E MayerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6662-8237
Maximilian NepelDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, Austria.
Rumsais BlatrixCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS UMR 5175, France.
Felix B OberhauserDepartment of Zoology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, Regensburg, Germany.
Konrad FiedlerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, Austria.
Jürg SchönenbergerDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, Austria.
Hermann VoglmayrDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascomycete fungi in the nests of ants inhabiting plants (= myrmecophytes) are very often cultivated by the ants in small patches and used as food source. Where these fungi come from is not known yet. Two scenarios of fungus recruitment are possible: (1) random infection through spores or hyphal fragments from the environment, or (2) transmission from mother to daughter colonies by the foundress queen. It is also not known at which stage of the colony life cycle fungiculture is initiated, and whether the- symbiont fungi serve as food for the ant queen. To clarify these questions, we investigated four Azteca ant species inhabiting three different Cecropia species (C. insignis, C. obtusifolia, and C. peltata). We analysed an rRNA gene fragment from 52 fungal patches produced by founding queens and compared them with those from established Azteca colonies (n = 54). The infrabuccal pockets of winged queens were dissected to investigate whether young queens carry fungi from their mother colony. Additionally, 15N labelling experiments were done to verify whether the queen feeds on the patches until she is nourished by her first worker offspring. We infer from the results that the fungi cultivated in hollow plant structures are transferred from the parental colony of the young queen. First, fungal genotypes/OTU diversity was not significantly different between foundress queen patches and established colonies, and second, hyphal parts were discovered in the infrabuccal pockets of female alates. We could show that fungiculture already starts before queens lay their eggs, and that the queens do not feed on fungal patch material but feed it to the larvae. Our findings suggest that fungiculture may be crucial for successful colony founding of arboreal ants in the tropics.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntsAscomycotaCecropia PlantDNA, FungalFemaleDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID29466381
PMCPMC5821464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.