ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2018
Expedited Partner Therapy: Pharmacist Refusal of Legal Prescriptions.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021Guideline
- Neighborhood Social Vulnerability and Access to Expedited Partner Therapy Prescriptions: A Secret Shopper Audit Survey.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators of Expedited Partner Therapy in U.S. Emergency Departments: A Nationwide Qualitative Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Best Practice Alert on Expedited Partner Therapy for Chlamydia Infection and Reinfection.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Partner Notification, Treatment, and Subsequent Condom Use After Pelvic Inflammatory Disease: Implications for Dyadic Intervention With Urban Youth.Clinical pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExpedited partner therapy (EPT) is an effective strategy for partner management of sexually transmitted infections. Some states, including Wisconsin, allow EPT prescriptions to be filled without a patient name. This study determined the refusal rates of nameless EPT prescriptions in Milwaukee pharmacies.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 3 trained research assistants of different age, sex, and race posed as "patients" and visited 50 pharmacy locations from one pharmacy chain in Milwaukee County, WI, to fill nameless EPT prescriptions. A χ test was used to compare demographics of patients, pharmacists, and pharmacies. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with prescription refusal.
resultsTwenty-nine (58%) of 50 nameless EPT prescriptions were refused. Univariate analysis showed that prescriptions were more likely to be refused if the pharmacy was in the suburbs (77%) compared with Milwaukee city (43%; P = 0.01), if the pharmacist was older than the patient (82%) compared with being younger (46%) or within the same age group (33%; P = 0.01 for both), and if the patient was white (78%) compared with nonwhite (47%; P = 0.03). Multivariable regression revealed significantly higher refusals for pharmacies located in the suburbs compared with the city (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-20.3; P = 0.03) and in patients who were white compared with nonwhite (odds ratio: 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-19.8; P = 0.01).
conclusionsMore than half of nameless EPT prescriptions were refused in Milwaukee county pharmacies, more frequently at suburban pharmacies and for white patients. Increased pharmacist education regarding EPT is essential to help combat the sexually transmitted infection crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.