Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29465640›Full record

ReviewSexually transmitted diseases2018

Context-Appropriate Interventions to Prevent Syphilis: A Narrative Review.

Thomas A Peterman, Susan Cha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas A PetermanFrom the Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA.
Susan Cha
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe success of an intervention to prevent syphilis will depend on the context and the goal of the intervention. To help programs choose interventions, we reviewed major changes in context and types of interventions that may be effective.

methodsWe reviewed the literature on the changing context of syphilis in the United States and interventions to prevent syphilis, focusing on articles that included evidence of effectiveness.

resultsPopulations acquiring syphilis are constantly changing. Currently, incidence is very high among men who have sex with men (MSM). Among adults, late disease caused by syphilis has become rare. Congenital syphilis incidence has been low but is increasing, and morbidity and mortality remain high when babies are infected. Congenital syphilis now causes more deaths than syphilis among adults.Routine screening of MSM can identify and treat infections before they progress to disease (secondary prevention). Screening rates are highest when done as part of routine standing orders. Partner notification effectiveness has decreased, partly because many partners are anonymous. Most congenital syphilis can be prevented by screening pregnant women; it has been eliminated in areas where intense primary prevention efforts eliminated syphilis among women.

conclusionsSo far, no program has stopped the increasing rates of infection among MSM, but secondary prevention efforts have prevented most disability. Congenital syphilis is increasing, and can be decreased by screening pregnant women and stopped by intensive efforts to prevent infection among women.

Indexed as

Contact TracingFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansIncidenceMaleMass ScreeningPregnancySexual and Gender MinoritiesSexual PartnersSyphilisSyphilis, CongenitalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29465640
PMCPMC6752042
OpenAlexW2789638064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.