ReviewMedicine2018
Atypical microdeletion in 22q11 deletion syndrome reveals new candidate causative genes: A case report and literature review.
Review in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Paragangliomas and syringomyelia in Tetralogy of Fallot-A case report and literature review.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Lateral thinking in syndromic congenital cardiovascular disease.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023Article
- FaNDOM: Fast nested distance-based seeding of optical maps.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- A case report of T-box 1 mutation causing phenotypic features of chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.Clinical diabetes and endocrinology · 2019Article
- Prenatal retinoic acid exposure reveals candidate genes for craniofacial disorders.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The SERCA2: A Gatekeeper of Neuronal Calcium Homeostasis in the Brain.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationale22q11 deletion syndrome, the most common chromosomal microdeletion disease, is caused by megabase-sized deletions on chromosome 22q11.2. It is characterized by a wide spectrum of congenital anomalies in velopharyngeal and facial, cardiac, genitourinary, vertebroskeletal, respiratory, digestive, and central nervous systems. Phenotype-genotype studies have revealed several causative genes that regulate the development of the third and fourth pharyngeal arches in human. However, the exact pathogenesis of this syndrome remains unknown. Herein, we report a case of 22q11 deletion syndrome with an atypical microdeletion of 125 kb. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 15-year-old Chinese girl presented with symptoms of facial dysmorphia, cardiac defects, velopharyngeal insufficiency, splenomegaly, immunodeficiency, and thrombocytopenia. DIAGNOSES: Microarray analysis revealed a 22q11.23 deletion of 125 kb (chromosome 22: 24276973-24402263), suggesting the diagnosis of 22q11 deletion syndrome. The haploinsufficient genes included GSTT2B, GSTT2, DDTL, DDT, GSTTP1, LOC391322, GSTT1, and GSTTP2.
interventionsThe patient was administrated glucocorticoids and calcium supplements. OUTCOMES: No epistaxis or petechiae episode occurred during the follow-up; her platelet count ranged between 60 × 10 and 80 × 10/L. LESSONS: Although none of the previous reported causative genes were affected in the patient, her clinical manifestations were typical of 22q11 deletion syndrome, apart from her progressive splenomegaly. This case indicated 8 new candidate pathogenic genes for 22q11 deletion syndrome. Given that the loss of these genes was sufficient to induce 22q11DS defects, whether these genes directly influence the pathogenesis of 22q11DS or through interactions with known hotspot mutations is worthy of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.