Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464911›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2018

CD Obesity-Prone Rats, but not Obesity-Resistant Rats, Robustly Ferment Resistant Starch Without Increased Weight or Fat Accretion.

Diana Obanda, Ryan Page, Justin Guice, Anne M Raggio, Claudia Husseneder, Brian Marx, Rhett W Stout, David A Welsh, Christopher M Taylor, Meng Luo and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tibetan Pig-Derived ProbioticFrontiers in nutrition · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diana ObandaSchool of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Ryan PageSchool of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Justin GuiceSchool of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Anne M RaggioSchool of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Claudia HussenederDepartment of Entomology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Brian MarxDepartment of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Rhett W StoutDepartment of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
David A WelshDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Christopher M TaylorDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7983-5275
Meng LuoDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Eugene E BlanchardDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Zach BendiksDepartment of Food Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Diana CoulonSchool of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Michael J KeenanSchool of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1282-8756
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USLouisiana State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study used CD obesity-prone (OP) and obesity-resistant (OR) rats to examine how weight gain and fat accretion relate to fermentation levels and microbiota composition after feeding resistant starch (RS).

methodsAfter feeding OP rats and OR rats a high-fat (HF) diet for 4 weeks, rats were stratified into three groups: they were fed either an HF diet (group 1: HF-HF) or were switched to a low-fat (LF) diet (group 2: HF-LF) or an LF diet supplemented with 20% RS by weight for 4 weeks (group 3: HF-LFRS). Energy intake, body weight, fermentation variables, and microbiota composition were determined.

resultsIn OP rats, RS elicited robust fermentation (increased cecal contents, short-chain fatty acids, and serum glucagon-like peptide 1). Total bacteria, species of the Bacteroidales family S24-7, and the archaean Methanobrevibacter smithii increased. The robust fermentation did not elicit higher weight or fat accretion when compared with that of control rats fed the same isocaloric diets (HF-LF ± RS). In OR rats, body weight and fat accretion were also not different between HF-LF ± RS diets, but RS elicited minimal changes in fermentation and microbiota composition.

conclusionsRobust fermentation did not contribute to greater weight. Fermentation levels and changes in microbiota composition in response to dietary RS differed by obesity phenotype.

Indexed as

AnimalsDietary FatsMaleObesityRatsStarchWeight GainDietary FatsStarch

Identifiers

PMID29464911
PMCPMC5826621
OpenAlexW2793808076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.