Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464801›Full record

SynthesisPhytotherapy research : PTR2018

Herbal medicine for depression and anxiety: A systematic review with assessment of potential psycho-oncologic relevance.

K Simon Yeung, Marisol Hernandez, Jun J Mao, Ingrid Haviland, Jyothirmai Gubili

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Phytotherapy research : PTR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects and safety ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Putative Antidepressant Effect of Chamomile (Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Zoological research · 2025
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K Simon YeungIntegrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Marisol HernandezInformation Systems/Medical Library, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Jun J MaoIntegrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Ingrid HavilandIntegrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
Jyothirmai GubiliIntegrative Medicine Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5345-4987
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety and depression are prevalent among cancer patients, with significant negative impact. Many patients prefer herbs for symptom relief to conventional medications which have limited efficacy/side effects. We identified single-herb medicines that may warrant further study in cancer patients. Our search included PubMed, Allied and Complementary Medicine, Embase, and Cochrane databases, selecting only single-herb randomized controlled trials between 1996 and 2016 in any population for data extraction, excluding herbs with known potential for interactions with cancer treatments. One hundred articles involving 38 botanicals met our criteria. Among herbs most studied (≥6 randomized controlled trials each), lavender, passionflower, and saffron produced benefits comparable to standard anxiolytics and antidepressants. Black cohosh, chamomile, and chasteberry are also promising. Anxiety or depressive symptoms were measured in all studies, but not always as primary endpoints. Overall, 45% of studies reported positive findings with fewer adverse effects compared with conventional medications. Based on available data, black cohosh, chamomile, chasteberry, lavender, passionflower, and saffron appear useful in mitigating anxiety or depression with favorable risk-benefit profiles compared to standard treatments. These may benefit cancer patients by minimizing medication load and accompanying side effects. However, well-designed larger clinical trials are needed before these herbs can be recommended and to further assess their psycho-oncologic relevance.

Indexed as

Anti-Anxiety AgentsAnxietyAnxiety DisordersCombined Modality TherapyDepressionDepressive DisorderHerbal MedicineHumansNeoplasmsPhytotherapyPlant ExtractsPlants, MedicinalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Anxiety AgentsPlant Extractsantidepressantanxietyanxiolyticcancerdepressionherbal medicine

Identifiers

PMID29464801
PMCPMC5938102
OpenAlexW2791314673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.