Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464671›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics - open2018

An Exploratory Study of Long-Term Publicly Waitlisted Bariatric Surgery Patients' Quality of Life Before and 1 Year After Bariatric Surgery, and Considerations for Healthcare Planners.

Julie A Campbell, Martin Hensher, Amanda Neil, Alison Venn, Stephen Wilkinson, Andrew J Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie A CampbellMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Medical Sciences 2 Building, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Martin HensherDepartment of Health and Human Services, Level 2, 22 Elizabeth Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Amanda NeilMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Medical Sciences 2 Building, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Alison VennMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Medical Sciences 2 Building, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Stephen WilkinsonRoyal Hobart Hospital, 48 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Andrew J PalmerMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Medical Sciences 2 Building, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. Andrew.Palmer@utas.edu.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1076899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term publicly waitlisted bariatric surgery patients typically experience debilitating physical/psychosocial obesity-related comorbidities that profoundly affect their quality of life.

objectivesWe sought to measure quality-of-life impacts in a study population of severely obese patients who had multiyear waitlist times and then underwent bariatric surgery.

methodsParticipants were recruited opportunistically following a government-funded initiative to provide bariatric surgery to morbidly obese long-term waitlisted patients. Participants self-completed the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D questionnaires pre- and postoperatively. Utility valuations (utilities) and individual/super dimension scores (AQoL-8D only) were generated.

resultsParticipants' (n = 23) waitlisted time was mean [standard deviation (SD)] 6.5 (2) years, body mass index reduced from 49.3 (9.35) kg/m

conclusionsOngoing improvements in psychosocial parameters from 3 months to 1 year post-surgery accounted for improvements in overall utilities measured by the AQoL-8D that were not detected by EQ-5D-5L. Selection of a sensitive instrument is important to adequately assess changes in quality of life and to accurately reflect changes in quality-adjusted life-years for cost-utility analyses and resource allocation in a public healthcare resource-constrained environment.

Identifiers

PMID29464671
PMCPMC5820239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.