Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464662›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Clinical routine assessment of palliative care symptoms and concerns and caregiver burden in glioblastoma patients: an explorative field study.

Matthias Seibl-Leven, Christian von Reeken, Roland Goldbrunner, Stefan Grau, Maximilian Ingolf Ruge, Norbert Galldiks, Veronika Dunkl, Martin Kocher, Raymond Voltz, Heidrun Golla

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Palliative care in glioblastoma patients: a systematic review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Conducting a randomized controlled clinical trial on palliative care in patients with glioblastoma - what are the challenges?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthias Seibl-LevenCenter of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christian von ReekenDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany.
Roland GoldbrunnerCenter of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan GrauCenter of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maximilian Ingolf RugeCenter of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksCenter of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
Veronika DunklCenter of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
Martin KocherCenter of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
Raymond VoltzCenter of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
Heidrun GollaCenter of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany. heidrun.golla@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-630X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of self-reported outcome measurements into clinical routine was tested to help facilitate early access to palliative care (PC) for glioblastoma (GBM)-patients. Measures detail PC symptoms and concerns and caregiver burden. Between January 2014 and December 2016, a total of 337 GBM-patients were discussed during meetings of the neuro-oncology tumor board to examine further treatment options. Each patient, along with their caregivers, was requested to participate in self-assessment using the palliative outcome scale (POS) and the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Analyses encompassed summary statistics, non-parametric tests, visual graphic analysis, content analysis and assessing the utilization of the specialized PC consulting service (SPCCS). Ninety-five (28%) GBM-patients and 71 (21%) caregivers completed the self-assessment. Of these, 20 patients and 12 caregivers repeated the assessment at least once more during follow-up. POS total scores were similar in the group of patients with initial diagnosis [10 (0-31)] and those with later disease stages like recurrent diagnosis [9 (0-25)], but ZBI total scores differed [14 (0-51) vs. 24 (2-62)]. Single item analysis demonstrated that anxiety and worries about the future predominated. Caregivers were torn between high engagement in caring and feeling overburdened. Still, requests for the SPCCS showed no increase. Actual implementation of measures like POS and ZBI for detecting PC concerns and caregiver burden with GBM-patients in the field remains challenging as indicated by the limited response rate and lack of increased requests for the SPCCS. Modified clinical routines including strengthening awareness of PC, and allowing proxy-assessment might help to overcome barriers.

Indexed as

Palliative CareAnxietyCaregiversCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCost of IllnessFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrimary PreventionProspective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsCaregiver burdenField studyGlioblastomaPalliative carePalliative outcome scaleZarit Burden Interview

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.