ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
Clinical routine assessment of palliative care symptoms and concerns and caregiver burden in glioblastoma patients: an explorative field study.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Palliative care in glioblastoma patients: a systematic review.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024Pooled it
- Conducting a randomized controlled clinical trial on palliative care in patients with glioblastoma - what are the challenges?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Outcomes of inpatient chemoradiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and significant functional impairment.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- The relationship between proxy decision-making content and cues by families of patients with malignant brain tumor: A descriptive qualitative study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2025Article
- Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Palliative Care Service Utilization and Advance Care Planning for Adult Glioblastoma Patients: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Effect of early palliative care for patients with glioblastoma (EPCOG): a randomised phase III clinical trial protocol.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Supportive Care Needs in Glioma Patients and Their Caregivers in Clinical Practice: Results of a Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- The "Surprise Question" in Neurorehabilitation-Prognosis Estimation by Neurologist and Palliative Care Physician; a Longitudinal, Prospective, Observational Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Article
- Integrated early palliative care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: The GLIOSUPPORT feasibility study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The implementation of self-reported outcome measurements into clinical routine was tested to help facilitate early access to palliative care (PC) for glioblastoma (GBM)-patients. Measures detail PC symptoms and concerns and caregiver burden. Between January 2014 and December 2016, a total of 337 GBM-patients were discussed during meetings of the neuro-oncology tumor board to examine further treatment options. Each patient, along with their caregivers, was requested to participate in self-assessment using the palliative outcome scale (POS) and the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Analyses encompassed summary statistics, non-parametric tests, visual graphic analysis, content analysis and assessing the utilization of the specialized PC consulting service (SPCCS). Ninety-five (28%) GBM-patients and 71 (21%) caregivers completed the self-assessment. Of these, 20 patients and 12 caregivers repeated the assessment at least once more during follow-up. POS total scores were similar in the group of patients with initial diagnosis [10 (0-31)] and those with later disease stages like recurrent diagnosis [9 (0-25)], but ZBI total scores differed [14 (0-51) vs. 24 (2-62)]. Single item analysis demonstrated that anxiety and worries about the future predominated. Caregivers were torn between high engagement in caring and feeling overburdened. Still, requests for the SPCCS showed no increase. Actual implementation of measures like POS and ZBI for detecting PC concerns and caregiver burden with GBM-patients in the field remains challenging as indicated by the limited response rate and lack of increased requests for the SPCCS. Modified clinical routines including strengthening awareness of PC, and allowing proxy-assessment might help to overcome barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29464662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.