Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464550›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2018

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Drugs in the Central Nervous System.

Nithya Srinivas, Kaitlyn Maffuid, Angela D M Kashuba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Biodistribution, Radiation Dosimetry, and Kinetic Modeling of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pharmacology of HIV Cure: Site of Action.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nithya SrinivasDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 1094 Genetic Medicine Building, CB# 7361, 120 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Kaitlyn MaffuidDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 1094 Genetic Medicine Building, CB# 7361, 120 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Angela D M KashubaDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 1094 Genetic Medicine Building, CB# 7361, 120 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. akashuba@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Multi-Species Mechanisms of Drug Bio-distribution in HIV Tissue ReservoirsR01AI111891 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KASHUBA, ANGELA D · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite contributing significantly to the burden of global disease, the translation of new treatment strategies for diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) from animals to humans remains challenging, with a high attrition rate in the development of CNS drugs. The failure of clinical trials for CNS therapies can be partially explained by factors related to pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), such as lack of efficacy or improper selection of the initial dosage. A focused assessment is needed for CNS-acting drugs in first-in-human studies to identify the differences in PK/PD from animal models, as well as to choose the appropriate dose. In this review, we summarize the available literature from human studies on the PK and PD in brain tissue, cerebrospinal fluid, and interstitial fluid for drugs used in the treatment of psychosis, Alzheimer's disease and neuro-HIV, and address critical questions in the field. We also explore newer methods to characterize PK/PD relationships that may lead to more efficient dose selection in CNS drug development.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBiomarkersBrainCentral Nervous System AgentsComputer SimulationDrug DevelopmentExtracellular FluidHumansIntracellular FluidTissue DistributionBiomarkersCentral Nervous System Agents

Identifiers

PMID29464550
PMCPMC6062484
OpenAlexW2789019261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.