Trial reportJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2018
Optimal Human Passive Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Does Not Rely on Passive Training.
Trial report in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Head impulse compensatory saccades: Visual dependence is most evident in bilateral vestibular loss.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Visual information potentiates incremental VOR adaptation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Transiently worse postural effects after vestibulo-ocular reflex gain-down adaptation in healthy adults.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Reporting of exercise dose and dosage and outcome measures for gaze stabilisation in the literature: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Article
- Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation Reduces when Training Demand Variability Increases.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
- The instantaneous training demand drives vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
- Retinal Image Slip Must Pass the Threshold for Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020Article
- Improvement After Vestibular Rehabilitation Not Explained by Improved Passive VOR Gain.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Gaze stabilisation exercises in vestibular rehabilitation: review of the evidence and recent clinical advances.Journal of neurology · 2019Review
- Human Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Adaptation: Consolidation Time Between Repeated Training Blocks Improves Retention.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Article
- Vestibular compensation: extended review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is the main vision-stabilising system during rapid head movements in humans. A visual-vestibular mismatch stimulus can be used to train or adapt the VOR response because it induces a retinal image slip error signal that drives VOR motor learning. The training context has been shown to affect VOR adaptation. We sought to determine whether active (self-generated) versus passive (externally imposed) head rotation vestibular training would differentially affect adaptation and short-term retention of the active and passive VOR responses. Ten subjects were tested, each over six separate 1.5-h sessions. We compared active versus passive head impulse (transient, rapid head rotations with peak velocity ~ 150 °/s) VOR adaptation training lasting 15 min with the VOR gain challenged to increment, starting at unity, by 0.1 every 90 s towards one side only (this adapting side was randomised to be either left or right). The VOR response was tested/measured in darkness at 10-min intervals, 20-min intervals, and two single 60-min interval sessions for 1 h post-training. The training was active or passive for the 10- and 20-min interval sessions, but only active for the two single 60-min interval sessions. The mean VOR response increase due to training was ~ 10 % towards the adapting side versus ~2 % towards the non-adapting side. There was no difference in VOR adaptation and retention between active and passive VOR training. The only factor to affect retention was exposure to a de-adaptation stimulus. These data suggest that active VOR adaptation training can be used to optimally adapt the passive VOR and that adaptation is completely retained over 1 h as long as there is no visual feedback signal driving de-adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.