ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2018
Cardio-pulmonary responses to incremental eccentric and concentric cycling tests to task failure.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interval eccentric cycling : a promising training modality for sedentary people.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Trial
- Cadence effects on cardiorespiratory and muscular responses during eccentric cycling.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Trial
- Superior effects of high-intensity interval eccentric cycling training on neuromuscular adaptations with similar aerobic adaptations to concentric cycling.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Peak Eccentric Cycling Exercise and Cardiorespiratory Responses to Normobaric Hypoxia Versus Normobaric Normoxia in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Peak Oxygen Uptake is Slope Dependent: Insights from Ground Reaction Forces and Muscle Oxygenation in Trained Male Runners.Sports medicine - open · 2024Article
- Submaximal, Low-Dose Eccentric vs Traditional Cycling Exercise: Reduced Oxygen Uptake and Pulmonary Artery Pressure Assessed by Echocardiography in Healthy Middle-aged Adults. A Randomized Controlled, Crossover Trial.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular Responses to Eccentric Cycling Based on Perceived Exertion Compared to Concentric Cycling, Effect of Pedaling Rate, and Sex.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Moving forward with backward pedaling: a review on eccentric cycling.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Review
- Reliability of a Protocol to Elicit Peak Measures Generated by the Lower Limb for Semi-recumbent Eccentric Cycling.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- Level, Uphill, and Downhill Running Economy Values Are Correlated Except on Steep Slopes.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Comparison between high- and low-intensity eccentric cycling of equal mechanical work for muscle damage and the repeated bout effect.European journal of applied physiology · 2020Article
- Aerobic Metabolic Adaptations in Endurance Eccentric Exercise and Training: From Whole Body to Mitochondria.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- Neuromuscular and Perceptual Responses to Sub-Maximal Eccentric Cycling.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study compared cardio-pulmonary responses between incremental concentric and eccentric cycling tests, and examined factors affecting the maximal eccentric cycling capacity.
methodsOn separate days, nine men and two women (32.6 ± 9.4 years) performed an upright seated concentric (CON) and an eccentric (ECC) cycling test, which started at 75 W and increased 25 W min
resultsPeak power output was 53% greater (P < 0.001, g = 1.77) for ECC (449 ± 115 W) than CON (294 ± 61 W), but peak oxygen consumption was 43% lower (P < 0.001, g = 2.18) for ECC (30.6 ± 5.6 ml kg min
conclusionUnexpectedly, maximal HR was similar between CON and ECC. Although ECC power output can be predicted from CON peak power output, an incremental eccentric cycling test performed after 3-6 familiarisation sessions may be useful in programming ECC training with healthy and accustomed individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29464353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.