ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2018
[Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma : Results after 84 resections].
Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Conventional and Stereotactic Microwave Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing worldwide. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment option. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study analyzed the prognostic factors after resection of ICC. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 84 patients were surgically treated under potentially curative intent. Perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas were excluded. The 5‑year survival was analyzed with respect to tumor stage (TNM), number of lesions, complete surgical resection (R0), peritoneal carcinosis and postoperative complications.
resultsThe 5‑year survival was 27% and 77% of patients underwent R0 resections. In the univariate analysis a T stage >2, an N+ situation or an R+ resection as well as peritoneal and multilocular intrahepatic spread were associated with a poorer prognosis. Postoperative complications also negatively influenced survival. On multivariate analysis the absence of peritoneal spread, node-negative tumor stages, singular hepatic lesions and a low T stage as well as the absence of complications were associated with improved survival. DISCUSSION: The prognosis of ICC is poor even after successful surgical resection. Well-known tumor characteristics such as TNM are relevant prognostic factors. Surgical resection is accompanied by postoperative complications (most frequently biliary), which negatively influence survival. Adjuvant strategies are urgently needed to improve long-term survival even after complete surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29464308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.