ArticlePsychopharmacology2018
Nicotine drug discrimination and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in differentially reared rats.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurobehavioral effects of environmental enrichment and drug abuse vulnerability: An updated review.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2022Review
- Social Isolation: How Can the Effects on the Cholinergic System Be Isolated?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleIndividuals vary in sensitivity to the behavioral effects of nicotine, resulting in differences in vulnerability to nicotine addiction. The role of rearing environment in determining individual sensitivity to nicotine is unclear. The neuropharmacological mechanisms mediating the effect of rearing environment on the behavioral actions of nicotine are also poorly understood.
objectivesThe contribution of rearing environment in determining the sensitivity to the interoceptive effects of nicotine was determined in rats reared in isolated conditions (IC) or enriched conditions (EC). The role of dopamine receptors and α4β2*-nicotinic acetylcholine (nACh) receptors in mediating the differential effect of IC and EC on the interoceptive action of nicotine was determined.
methodsThe interoceptive action of nicotine was measured as the discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine. Mecamylamine- and eticlopride-inhibition of the nicotine stimulus were used to examine nACh and dopamine receptors, respectively. α4β2*-nACh receptor expression in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway was determined by quantitative autoradiography of [
resultsEC-reared rats are less sensitive than IC-reared rats to the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine at all but maximally effective doses. Mecamylamine inhibited the nicotine stimulus threefold more potently in EC-reared rats (IC
conclusionsRearing environment regulates the sensitivity to the interoceptive effects of nicotine and α4β2*-nACh receptor expression in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.