Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464191›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Impact of NMDA Receptor Overexpression on Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Activity and Motor Learning.

Elisa Galliano, Martijn Schonewille, Saša Peter, Mandy Rutteman, Simone Houtman, Dick Jaarsma, Freek E Hoebeek, Chris I De Zeeuw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. NMDARs in granule cells contribute to parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synaptic plasticity and motor learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa GallianoDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6941-766X
Martijn SchonewilleDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-1393
Saša PeterDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mandy RuttemanDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Simone HoutmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dick JaarsmaDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0519-2940
Freek E HoebeekDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2178-5965
Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5628-8187
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many brain regions involved in learning NMDA receptors (NMDARs) act as coincidence detectors of pre- and postsynaptic activity, mediating Hebbian plasticity. Intriguingly, the parallel fiber (PF) to Purkinje cell (PC) input in the cerebellar cortex, which is critical for procedural learning, shows virtually no postsynaptic NMDARs. Why is this? Here, we address this question by generating and testing independent transgenic lines that overexpress NMDAR containing the type 2B subunit (NR2B) specifically in PCs. PCs of the mice that show larger NMDA-mediated currents than controls at their PF input suffer from a blockage of long-term potentiation (LTP) at their PF-PC synapses, while long-term depression (LTD) and baseline transmission are unaffected. Moreover, introducing NMDA-mediated currents affects cerebellar learning in that phase-reversal of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is impaired. Our results suggest that under physiological circumstances PC spines lack NMDARs postsynaptically at their PF input so as to allow LTP to contribute to motor learning.

Indexed as

AnimalsEye MovementsFemaleLearningMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMotor ActivityNeuronal PlasticityPurkinje CellsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateReflexSynapsesTissue Culture TechniquesVisual PerceptionReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartatecerebellumcompensatory eye movementsmotor learningNMDAPurkinkje cellsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID29464191
PMCPMC5815660
OpenAlexW2788300946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.