Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464164›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2018

An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Is Safe and Effective.

Arezoo Astanehe, Claire Temple-Oberle, Markus Nielsen, William de Haas, Robert Lindsay, Jennifer Matthews, David C McKenzie, Justin Yeung, Christiaan Schrag

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. [Perioperative management of direct-to-implant-based breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients and West China Hospital experiences].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arezoo AstaneheDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Claire Temple-OberleDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Markus NielsenDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
William de HaasDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Robert LindsayDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jennifer MatthewsDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
David C McKenzieDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Justin YeungDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Christiaan SchragDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate a standardized perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) clinical care pathway in microsurgical abdominal-based breast reconstruction.

methodsDevelopment of a clinical care pathway was informed by the latest ERAS guideline for breast reconstruction. Key features included shortened preoperative fasting, judicious fluids, multimodal analgesics, early oral nutrition, early Foley catheter removal, and early ambulation. There were 3 groups of women in this cohort study: (1) traditional historical control; (2) transition group with partial implementation; and (3) ERAS. Narcotic use, patient-reported pain scores, antiemetic use, time to regular diet, time to first walk, hospital length of stay, and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the groups.

resultsAfter implementation of the pathway, the use of parenteral narcotics was reduced by 88% (traditional, 112 mg; transition, 58 mg; ERAS, 13 mg;

conclusionsA clinical care pathway in microsurgical breast reconstruction using the ERAS Society guideline promotes successful early recovery.

Identifiers

PMID29464164
PMCPMC5811294
OpenAlexW2791758114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.