Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464146›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2018

Virtual Surgical Planning: The Pearls and Pitfalls.

Johnny I Efanov, Andrée-Anne Roy, Ke N Huang, Daniel E Borsuk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Surgical Planning of Ballistic Facial Injuries.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in Surgery for Complex Craniosynostosis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johnny I EfanovPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Andrée-Anne RoyPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Ke N HuangPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Daniel E BorsukPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOver the past few years, virtual surgical planning (VSP) has evolved into a useful tool for the craniofacial surgeon. Virtual planning and computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) may assist in orthognathic, cranio-orbital, traumatic, and microsurgery of the craniofacial skeleton. Despite its increasing popularity, little emphasis has been placed on the learning curve.

methodsA retrospective analysis of consecutive virtual surgeries was done from July 2012 to October 2016 at the University of Montreal Teaching Hospitals. Orthognathic surgeries and free vascularized bone flap surgeries were included in the analysis.

resultsFifty-four virtual surgeries were done in the time period analyzed. Forty-six orthognathic surgeries and 8 free bone transfers were done. An analysis of errors was done. Eighty-five percentage of the orthognathic virtual plans were adhered to completely, 4% of the plans were abandoned, and 11% were partially adhered to. Seventy-five percentage of the virtual surgeries for free tissue transfers were adhered to, whereas 25% were partially adhered to. The reasons for abandoning the plans were (1) poor communication between surgeon and engineer, (2) poor appreciation for condyle placement on preoperative scans, (3) soft-tissue impedance to bony movement, (4) rapid tumor progression, (5) poor preoperative assessment of anatomy.

conclusionVirtual surgical planning is a useful tool for craniofacial surgery but has inherent issues that the surgeon must be aware of. With time and experience, these surgical plans can be used as powerful adjuvants to good clinical judgement.

Identifiers

PMID29464146
PMCPMC5811276
OpenAlexW2791044984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.