Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29464076›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Quantitative radiomic profiling of glioblastoma represents transcriptomic expression.

Doo-Sik Kong, Junhyung Kim, Gyuha Ryu, Hye-Jin You, Joon Kyung Sung, Yong Hee Han, Hye-Mi Shin, In-Hee Lee, Sung-Tae Kim, Chul-Kee Park and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Radiomic prediction models for the level of Ki-67 and p53 in glioma.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Doo-Sik KongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Junhyung KimInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gyuha RyuDepartment of Health Science and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye-Jin YouInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon Kyung SungDepartment of Computer Science, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong Hee HanMedical System Research Department, Convergence Technology Institute, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Hye-Mi ShinInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
In-Hee LeeInstitute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Tae KimDepartment of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Kee ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hong ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Won ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho Jun SeolDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Il LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Do-Hyun NamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative imaging biomarkers have increasingly emerged in the field of research utilizing available imaging modalities. We aimed to identify good surrogate radiomic features that can represent genetic changes of tumors, thereby establishing noninvasive means for predicting treatment outcome. From May 2012 to June 2014, we retrospectively identified 65 patients with treatment-naïve glioblastoma with available clinical information from the Samsung Medical Center data registry. Preoperative MR imaging data were obtained for all 65 patients with primary glioblastoma. A total of 82 imaging features including first-order statistics, volume, and size features, were semi-automatically extracted from structural and physiologic images such as apparent diffusion coefficient and perfusion images. Using commercially available software, NordicICE, we performed quantitative imaging analysis and collected the dataset composed of radiophenotypic parameters. Unsupervised clustering methods revealed that the radiophenotypic dataset was composed of three clusters. Each cluster represented a distinct molecular classification of glioblastoma; classical type, proneural and neural types, and mesenchymal type. These clusters also reflected differential clinical outcomes. We found that extracted imaging signatures does not represent copy number variation and somatic mutation. Quantitative radiomic features provide a potential evidence to predict molecular phenotype and treatment outcome. Radiomic profiles represents transcriptomic phenotypes more well.

Indexed as

classificationglioblastomaphenotypesquantitative imagingradiomic

Identifiers

PMID29464076
PMCPMC5814216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.