Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29463908›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

Neural responses to cues paired with methamphetamine in healthy volunteers.

Kathryne Van Hedger, Sarah K Keedy, Leah M Mayo, Markus Heilig, Harriet de Wit

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathryne Van HedgerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sarah K KeedyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Leah M MayoCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Markus HeiligCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. hdew@uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · USLinköping University · SE

Funding

Acquisition and persistence of drug cue conditioning in humans - Resubmission 01R01DA037011 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2014 to 2018
$2.3M
Training in Emerging Multidisciplinary Approaches to Mental Health and DiseaseT32MH020065 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NICOLAE, DAN LIVIU, RZHETSKY, ANDREY · 2002 to 2017
$2.3M
3T MRI Scanner for multidisciplinary imaging and image-guided therapyS10OD018448 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI KARCZMAR, GREGORY S. · 2014 to 2014
$2.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037011NIH HHS S10 OD018448NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug cues, or conditioned responses to stimuli paired with drugs, are widely believed to promote drug use. The acquisition of these conditioned responses has been well characterized in laboratory animals: neutral stimuli paired with drugs elicit conditioned responses resembling the motivational and incentive properties of the drug itself. However, few studies have examined acquisition of conditioning, or the nature of the conditioned response, in humans. In this study, we used fMRI to examine neural responses to stimuli that had been paired with methamphetamine or placebo in healthy young adults. Participants first underwent four conditioning sessions in which visual-auditory stimuli were paired with either methamphetamine (20 mg, oral) or placebo. Then on a drug-free test day, the stimuli were presented during an fMRI scan to assess neural responses to the stimuli. We hypothesized that the stimuli would elicit drug-like brain activity, especially in regions related to reward. Instead, we found that the methamphetamine-paired stimuli, compared to placebo-paired stimuli, produced greater activation in regions related to visual and auditory processing, consistent with the drug's unconditioned effects on sensory processing. This is the first study to demonstrate conditioned neural responses to drug-paired stimuli after just two pairings of methamphetamine in healthy adults. The study also illustrates that conditioned responses may develop to unexpected components of the drug's effects.

Indexed as

CuesAdolescentAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersBlood PressureBrainBrain MappingCentral Nervous System StimulantsConditioning, PsychologicalFemaleHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMethamphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID29463908
PMCPMC6006246
OpenAlexW2792963840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.