Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29463895›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2018

Cryptophyta as major bacterivores in freshwater summer plankton.

Vesna Grujcic, Julia K Nuy, Michaela M Salcher, Tanja Shabarova, Vojtech Kasalicky, Jens Boenigk, Manfred Jensen, Karel Simek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Vesna GrujcicBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Na Sádkách 7, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic. vesna.grujcic@hbu.cas.cz.
Julia K NuyBiodiversity, University Duisburg-Essen, 45117, Essen, Germany.
Michaela M SalcherBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Na Sádkách 7, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-6523
Tanja ShabarovaBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Na Sádkách 7, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Vojtech KasalickyBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Na Sádkách 7, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Jens BoenigkBiodiversity, University Duisburg-Essen, 45117, Essen, Germany.
Manfred JensenBiodiversity, University Duisburg-Essen, 45117, Essen, Germany.
Karel SimekBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, Na Sádkách 7, 37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small bacterivorous eukaryotes play a cardinal role in aquatic food webs and their taxonomic classification is currently a hot topic in aquatic microbial ecology. Despite increasing interest in their diversity, core questions regarding predator-prey specificity remain largely unanswered, e.g., which heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNFs) are the main bacterivores in freshwaters and which prokaryotes support the growth of small HNFs. To answer these questions, we fed natural communities of HNFs from Římov reservoir (Czech Republic) with five different bacterial strains of the ubiquitous betaproteobacterial genera Polynucleobacter and Limnohabitans. We combined amplicon sequencing and catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) targeting eukaryotic 18 S rRNA genes to track specific responses of the natural HNF community to prey amendments. While amplicon sequencing provided valuable qualitative data and a basis for designing specific probes, the number of reads was insufficient to accurately quantify certain eukaryotic groups. We also applied a double-hybridization technique that allows simultaneous phylogenetic identification of both predator and prey. Our results show that community composition of HNFs is strongly dependent upon prey type. Surprisingly, Cryptophyta were the most abundant bacterivores, although this phylum has been so far assumed to be mainly autotrophic. Moreover, the growth of a small lineage of Cryptophyta (CRY1 clade) was strongly stimulated by one Limnohabitans strain in our experiment. Thus, our study is the first report that colorless Cryptophyta are major bacterivores in summer plankton samples and can play a key role in the carbon transfer from prokaryotes to higher trophic levels.

Indexed as

BacteriaCryptophytaFood ChainFresh WaterHeterotrophic ProcessesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePhylogenyPlanktonSeasons

Identifiers

PMID29463895
PMCPMC6018765
OpenAlexW2794422343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.