Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29463716›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

The timescale of early land plant evolution.

Jennifer L Morris, Mark N Puttick, James W Clark, Dianne Edwards, Paul Kenrick, Silvia Pressel, Charles H Wellman, Ziheng Yang, Harald Schneider, Philip C J Donoghue

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 339 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
339citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

339 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The evolution of the Earth's surface iron cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Evolution ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Early evolutionary history of the seed.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review

279 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer L MorrisSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.
Mark N PuttickSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1011-3442
James W ClarkSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.
Dianne EdwardsSchool of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10, United Kingdom.
Paul KenrickDepartment of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3626-5460
Silvia PresselDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
Charles H WellmanDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7511-0464
Ziheng YangDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3351-7981
Harald SchneiderSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom; Phil.Donoghue@bristol.ac.uk harald@xtbg.ac.cn.
Philip C J DonoghueSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom; Phil.Donoghue@bristol.ac.uk harald@xtbg.ac.cn.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G006660/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N000609/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N000919/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Establishing the timescale of early land plant evolution is essential for testing hypotheses on the coevolution of land plants and Earth's System. The sparseness of early land plant megafossils and stratigraphic controls on their distribution make the fossil record an unreliable guide, leaving only the molecular clock. However, the application of molecular clock methodology is challenged by the current impasse in attempts to resolve the evolutionary relationships among the living bryophytes and tracheophytes. Here, we establish a timescale for early land plant evolution that integrates over topological uncertainty by exploring the impact of competing hypotheses on bryophyte-tracheophyte relationships, among other variables, on divergence time estimation. We codify 37 fossil calibrations for Viridiplantae following best practice. We apply these calibrations in a Bayesian relaxed molecular clock analysis of a phylogenomic dataset encompassing the diversity of Embryophyta and their relatives within Viridiplantae. Topology and dataset sizes have little impact on age estimates, with greater differences among alternative clock models and calibration strategies. For all analyses, a Cambrian origin of Embryophyta is recovered with highest probability. The estimated ages for crown tracheophytes range from Late Ordovician to late Silurian. This timescale implies an early establishment of terrestrial ecosystems by land plants that is in close accord with recent estimates for the origin of terrestrial animal lineages. Biogeochemical models that are constrained by the fossil record of early land plants, or attempt to explain their impact, must consider the implications of a much earlier, middle Cambrian-Early Ordovician, origin.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBiodiversityEcosystemFossilsHistory, AncientPhylogenyPlantsTime FactorsEmbryophytaevolutionphylogenyplanttimescale

Identifiers

PMID29463716
PMCPMC5877938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.