Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29463712›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Fundamental limits on dynamic inference from single-cell snapshots.

Caleb Weinreb, Samuel Wolock, Betsabeh K Tusi, Merav Socolovsky, Allon M Klein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 197 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
197citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

197 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Latent causal diffusions for single-cell perturbation modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Genomic repeats for single-cell molecular recording.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genome-wide chromatin recording resolves dynamic cell state changes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The molecular asynchrony of single cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. A modeller's guide for biomedical discovery.Disease models & mechanisms · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caleb WeinrebDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Samuel WolockDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.ORCID 0000-0002-2120-4788
Betsabeh K TusiDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605.
Merav SocolovskyDepartment of Molecular, Cell, and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605.
Allon M KleinDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; allon_klein@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8913-7879

Funding

Harvard Systems Biology Graduate ProgramT32GM080177 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHISON, TIMOTHY J, MURRAY, ANDREW W · 2010 to 2019
$2.8M
Epigenetic and Cell Cycle Functions of Glucocorticoids in Erythropoietic StressR01DK100915 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SOCOLOVSKY, MERAV · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100915NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell expression profiling reveals the molecular states of individual cells with unprecedented detail. Because these methods destroy cells in the process of analysis, they cannot measure how gene expression changes over time. However, some information on dynamics is present in the data: the continuum of molecular states in the population can reflect the trajectory of a typical cell. Many methods for extracting single-cell dynamics from population data have been proposed. However, all such attempts face a common limitation: for any measured distribution of cell states, there are multiple dynamics that could give rise to it, and by extension, multiple possibilities for underlying mechanisms of gene regulation. Here, we describe the aspects of gene expression dynamics that cannot be inferred from a static snapshot alone and identify assumptions necessary to constrain a unique solution for cell dynamics from static snapshots. We translate these constraints into a practical algorithmic approach, population balance analysis (PBA), which makes use of a method from spectral graph theory to solve a class of high-dimensional differential equations. We use simulations to show the strengths and limitations of PBA, and then apply it to single-cell profiles of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). Cell state predictions from this analysis agree with HPC fate assays reported in several papers over the past two decades. By highlighting the fundamental limits on dynamic inference faced by any method, our framework provides a rigorous basis for dynamic interpretation of a gene expression continuum and clarifies best experimental designs for trajectory reconstruction from static snapshot measurements.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAlgorithmsAnimalsHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsMiceSingle-Cell Analysisdynamic inferencehematopoiesispseudotimesingle cellspectral graph theory

Identifiers

PMID29463712
PMCPMC5878004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.