Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29463642›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

The Effect of Locomotion on Early Visual Contrast Processing in Humans.

Alex V Benjamin, Kirstie Wailes-Newson, Anna Ma-Wyatt, Daniel H Baker, Alex R Wade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Actions as perceptual experiments.Journal of vision · 2026
    Review
  3. Walking Modulates Active Auditory Sensing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Steady-state measures of visual suppression.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex V BenjaminDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO105DD, United Kingdom and.
Kirstie Wailes-NewsonDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO105DD, United Kingdom and.ORCID 0000-0002-9232-463X
Anna Ma-WyattDepartment of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005 Australia.
Daniel H BakerDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO105DD, United Kingdom and.ORCID 0000-0002-0161-443X
Alex R WadeDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO105DD, United Kingdom and wade@wadelab.net.ORCID 0000-0003-4871-2747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most of our knowledge about vision comes from experiments in which stimuli are presented to immobile human subjects or animals. In the case of human subjects, movement during psychophysical, electrophysiological, or neuroimaging experiments is considered to be a source of noise to be eliminated. Animals used in visual neuroscience experiments are typically restrained and, in many cases, anesthetized. In reality, however, vision is often used to guide the motion of awake, ambulating organisms. Recent work in mice has shown that locomotion elevates visual neuronal response amplitudes (Niell and Stryker, 2010; Erisken et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2014; Mineault et al., 2016) and reduces long-range gain control (Ayaz et al., 2013). Here, we used both psychophysics and steady-state electrophysiology to investigate whether similar effects of locomotion on early visual processing can be measured in humans. Our psychophysical results show that brisk walking has little effect on subjects' ability to detect briefly presented contrast changes and that co-oriented flankers are, if anything, more effective masks when subjects are walking. Our electrophysiological data were consistent with the psychophysics indicating no increase in stimulus-driven neuronal responses while walking and no reduction in surround suppression. In summary, we have found evidence that early contrast processing is altered by locomotion in humans but in a manner that differs from that reported in mice. The effects of locomotion on very low-level visual processing may differ on a species-by-species basis and may reflect important differences in the levels of arousal associated with locomotion.

Indexed as

AdultContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansLocomotionMaleWalkingYoung Adultarousalgain controllocomotionmurine modelsSSVEP

Identifiers

PMID29463642
PMCPMC5864146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.