Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29463489›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Mobile App Delivery of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in Oncological Patients: Usability Study.

Kerstin A Kessel, Marco Me Vogel, Anna Alles, Sophie Dobiasch, Hanna Fischer, Stephanie E Combs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mobile applications in radiation oncology-current choices and future potentials.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Oncologic treatment support via a dedicated mobile app: a prospective feasibility evaluation (OPTIMISE-1).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Opportunities in Telemedicine, Lessons Learned After COVID-19 and the Way Into the Future.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kerstin A KesselDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6544-8151
Marco Me VogelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2942-6761
Anna AllesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7601-2196
Sophie DobiaschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5358-7237
Hanna FischerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1959-7997
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-2864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile apps are evolving in the medical field. However, ongoing discussions have questioned whether such apps are really valuable and whether patients will accept their use in day-to-day clinical life. Therefore, we initiated a usability study in our department.

objectiveWe present our results of the first app prototype and patient testing of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment in oncological patients.

methodsWe developed an app prototype for the iOS operating system within eight months in three phases: conception, initial development, and pilot testing. For the HRQoL assessment, we chose to implement only the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30; German version 3). Usability testing was conducted for three months. Participation was voluntary and pseudonymized. After completion of the QLQ-C30 questionnaire using iPads provided by our department, we performed a short survey with 10 questions. This survey inquired about patients' opinions regarding general aspects, including technical advances in medicine, mobile and app assistance during cancer treatment, and the app-specific functions (eg, interface and navigation).

resultsAfter logging into the app, the user can choose between starting a questionnaire, reviewing answers (administrators only), and logging out. The questionnaire is displayed with the same information, questions, and answers as on the original QLQ-C30 sheet. No alterations in wording were made. Usability was tested with 81 patients; median age was 55 years. The median time for completing the HRQoL questionnaire on the iPad was 4.0 minutes. Of all participants, 84% (68/81) owned a mobile device. Similarly, 84% (68/81) of participants would prefer a mobile version of the HRQoL questionnaire instead of a paper-based version. Using the app in daily life during and after cancer treatment would be supported by 83% (67/81) of participants. In the prototype version of the app, data were stored on the device; in the future, 79% (64/81) of the patients would agree to transfer data via the Internet.

conclusionsOur usability test showed good results regarding attractiveness, operability, and understandability. Moreover, our results demonstrate a high overall acceptance of mobile apps and telemedicine in oncology. The HRQoL assessment via the app was accepted thoroughly by patients, and individuals are keen to use it in clinical routines, while data privacy and security must be ensured.

Indexed as

healthcare surveyshealth-related quality of lifemobile applicationsmobile appsoncologyquestionnairesradiation oncologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID29463489
PMCPMC5840479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.