Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29463267›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Hippocampus-sparing radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the primary brain tumor: the result of dosimetric study and neurocognitive function assessment.

Kyung Su Kim, Chan Woo Wee, Jin-Yong Seok, Joo Wan Hong, Jin-Beom Chung, Keun-Yong Eom, Jae-Sung Kim, Chae-Yong Kim, Young Ho Park, Yu Jung Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trade-offs in proton and photon radiotherapy for pituitary adenomas.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Long-term outcomes and late adverse effects of a prospective study on proton radiotherapy for patients with low-grade glioma.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyung Su KimDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chan Woo WeeDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Yong SeokDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro, Seongnamsi, Kyeonggido, 463-707, South Korea.
Joo Wan HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro, Seongnamsi, Kyeonggido, 463-707, South Korea.
Jin-Beom ChungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro, Seongnamsi, Kyeonggido, 463-707, South Korea.
Keun-Yong EomDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Sung KimDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chae-Yong KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnamsi, Republic of Korea.
Young Ho ParkDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnamsi, Republic of Korea.
Yu Jung KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnamsi, Republic of Korea.
In Ah KimDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. inah228@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare 0820010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe hypothesized that hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy via volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) could preserve the neurocognitive function (NCF) of patients with primary brain tumors treated with radiotherapy.

methodsWe reviewed data from patients with primary brain tumors who underwent hippocampal-sparing brain radiotherapy via VMAT between February 2014 and December 2015. The optimization criteria for the contralateral hippocampus was a maximum dose (D

resultsA total of 26 patients underwent NCF testing seven months after radiotherapy. Their median age was 49.5 years (range 26-77 years), and 14 (53.8%) had grade III/IV tumors. The median D

conclusionsThe contralateral hippocampus could be effectively spared in patients with primary brain tumor via VMAT to preserve the verbal memory function. Further investigation is needed to identify those patients who will most benefit from hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy of the primary brain tumor.

Indexed as

Organ Sparing TreatmentsAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHippocampusHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeurocognitive DisordersPrognosisRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedBrain radiotherapyHippocampusNeurocognitive function testPrimary brain tumorVolumetric modulated arc therapy

Identifiers

PMID29463267
PMCPMC5819694
OpenAlexW2790192116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.